Saturday, November 15, 2008

I'm Still doing my Duty (It's Something old I wrote back in 2004)









I’m still doing my duty

The same stimulus for freedom still resides inside me lighting my soul with a magnificent glow. I don’t slip, but I do allow other people to contribute and then I comment. As for the New World Order reality, I’ve never really heard of it until 1997 and became fully engaged to expose the plot by the Elite since 1999 when I saw the Hard Truth Website created by Robert Howard. I’ve wrote in carm.org in 2002, then shown articles for Chris’ Truth Forum in 2003, came to North star’s site in 2003, and now in late 2004, I’m at a wide variety of spots in making the real truth more known and focusing on developing myself and others spiritually so God’s work can be done.

I usually love to debate people on many occasions and it’s quite fun for me. It’s seems like day after day, fast and potent developments come our way to America and the world. One was the promotion of Peter Goss as the new CIA director when this guy had corrupt connections from the get go. First, not only is he part of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations, but during 9/11, he met up with ex-ISI chief Ahmad and Ahmad gave Mohammad Atta [one of 9/11 patsies] $100,000. He and Graham are one of the prime architects of the creation of Patriot Acts I and I (truly violations on our God-given fundamental civil liberties). According to Al Martin, this person contributed to the Iran Contra scandal and according to APFN, he’s introducing legislation giving extra surveillance power to the Central Intelligence Agency to be more intrusive unto the lives of the American people. This is sick obviously.







The 2004 Election was a pure show and Hegelian Dialect. Indeed, it was the dirtiest campaign in American History. I’m thinking to myself how could Bush win? It’s very simple: Bush just exploitated Kerry’s weakness of his “flip-flops” (which Bush also had in the past and present), present his extreme views (like Bush has), then scare the people half to death into claiming that if Kerry were elected, then the “terrorists” will have an increased change to attack America.

I really don’t assign blame to Evangelicals at all or any soul that vote for Bush for Kerry. I personally voted because of moral values among other issues. Most bible-believing Christians are good and inspiring individuals, but deception is a potent device utilized by wolves in sheep clothing like Bush or the Council on National Policy. George W. Bush hoodwinked many of them to vote for him since many folks with sincere religious beliefs believe that he will change the moral climate in America by producing harder anti-abortion laws, etc. Bush will do no such thing since he publicly stated that he never attends to revoke Roe v. Wade and feels that there is no litmus test on Supreme Court Justices. His “culture of life” bravado is a tactic instilling the false perception that Republicans are against abortion while Democrats aren’t when Republicans haven’t even attempted to enact massive amounts of real Pro-Life laws.


The majority of pro-Bush people and the pro-Kerry crowd are just victims of this phony system since both Bush and Kerry are sworn to be followers of the Skulls and Bones Secret Society. So, regardless of who would have won the election, little will change except on some domestic issues. Surprisingly, there was a high turn out among Americans with about 60% of eligible voters.

Ohio was the state that Kerry lost. New research is coming out by Greg Palast and others that Bush stole the election in Ohio. Time will tell if that's true or not. Now, Kerry is complaining that he lost because of Osama bin Laden (which is false) and criticizes Faux News which I don’t have a problem with since they are a Bush cheerleading station. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!! In terms of the “war on terrorism” where people are butchered by the thousands, Kerry would just use an ‘international’ smokescreen to justify his plans to kill men, women, and children basically.




Condoleezza Rice is now promoted by George W. Bush to be Secretary of State now. I abhor the racist cartoons about her made by liberals, but she is a robot. She’s very gifted and extremely intelligent, but to support blatant falsehoods (in Iraq especially) then use weak arguments to justify it and then lie about the 9/11 warnings is no courageous act. Condi, I love you as a human being, but what you need to do is to leave the CFR, wake up, and fight this Gestapo system ravishing the nation. What a shame that you are just following Bush at his every command like a servant. I’m no servant to a man, but to God alone.

Bush also is trying to get Alberto Gonzales confirmed as well as Attorney General. Poverty suffered as a child and adversity overcome by him are apart of his early childhood and I commend that, but Alberto’s record is blatantly radical. For one, he’s anti-life personally adhering to the utilitarian notion that the personhood of the unborn takes a bad seat and can be extinguished by virtue of unjust law. Additionally, Gonzales wanted to dissent with parental notification and gleefully accepts teenagers to kill an unborn child. Presently, even some Pro-Life groups are supporting him. The great delusion is deep in society I guess.





On civil liberties, he’s just as worse. Gonzales is one of the men that instigated the torture in Abu Ghraib (Like Native American displacement, African American Slavery, the Holocaust, Hiroshima, Dresden, Communist Holocausts in the former Soviet Union and China, etc. I will never forget about Abu Ghraib). One point of fact is that back in August 2002, he wrote a memo that anti-torture laws didn’t apply to the President. I have no problem with his suspicions about many international laws, but Gonzales doesn’t even approve of the Geneva Conventions (in a January 2002 draft memo, he called it obsolete), which is a legitimate law to not only protect other enemy prisoners, but protect against American G.I.s from sick and reprehensible treatment from the enemy. Therefore, Alberto wants torture unto all “terrorists” captured in the battlefield since he conceives them as not “enemy combatants” but “unlawful combatants” yet Congress never declared war on anyone and the universal moral principles of peace, justice, and equal treatment must be applied to all men. He even received as high as $100,000 from Enron in contributions. That explains why Bush wanted crooks in his administration because George W. Bush is a proven criminal.


Focusing on resurrecting my mind, body, and spirit to follow God’s will so the glory of God is upon all believers is my cherished duty. With us knowing about all of this, there is no time to whine or complain. People before us of every background went, fought, and died so we could be here on the Internet, the street, neighborhoods, and others areas to give the entire world on what’s real. I respect what Victor Thorn is doing confronting 9/11 deniers and making sharp literature detailing the criminal acts done by the internationalists.


ArnoldExposed.com

Also, I respect Alex Jones for his extra recent Net exposure of Arnold Schwarzenegger who’s a true Nazi and governor of California. Arnold is the type of guy who is so evil that it almost makes you feel sorry for people accepting his propaganda acts. From Schwarzenegger’s recent sexual harassment, to his racist comments about black people, to his support of the Nazi Kurt Waldheim (who killed 1,000s during WWII and was part of the U.N., another terrorist group), the praise of Adolf Hitler, being part of the Bohemian Grove, agreeing with embryonic stem cell research (the killing of life to save life which is degenerate and virtual 21st century cannibalism), and mocking of Jesus Christ in an interview with other character issues making him not worthy to be governor let alone President of the United States. Arnold’s ilk now are seeking to change Article 2, Section 5 of the Constitution so to allow foreign people to become President if they live in America.






A Brave New World is certainly upon with cloning and even some scientists who are actually very sick to think about creating hybrids of humans and animals. As for this Thanksgiving coming up, I have no problem with it since in this time people become more adjoined with their family members and contemplate on the blessings God gave you. Don’t make a mistake about it though: God is in control though he’s just using Satan to run this world for a season. We won. This is what’s real. We’re real.





By TruthSeeker24 (Timothy)
November 23, 2004

SOLA SCRIPTURA
SOLA FIDE
SOLA GLORIA DEO
SOLA CHRISTO
SOLA GRATIA

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
SEMPER LIBER


RESURRECTION

7 CITIES
NORFOLK
VIRGINIA BEACH
HAMPTON
SUFFOLK
NEWPORT NEWS
SUFFOLK
CHESAPEAKE


OTHERS:
POQUOSON
SMITHFIELD
SOUTHHAMPTON COUNTY
JAMESTOWN
YORKTOWN
NORTHHAMTPON COUNTY
ISLE OF WRIGHT
WILLIAMSBURG
EASTERN SHORE
ALL OF NORTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA
LANCASTER




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com --0-36877573-1101242216=:80325--

Sunday, November 9, 2008

The Pro Life Truth (I made this in February of 2004) A Classic


“ I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing; therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live.” (Deuteronomy 30:19)

“These six things the LORD hates, yes, seven are an abomination to Him; A proud look, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, A heart that devises wicked plans, feet that are swift to in running to evil, A false witness who speak lies, and one who sows discord among bethren.” (Proverbs 6:16-19)

They shed innocent blood, the blood of their sons and their daughters…and the land was polluted with blood…” (Pslams 106:38)

“We hold these truth to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by the Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Puruit of Happiness.”
-The Declaration of Independence (Ju ly 4, 1776)








Eugenic sterelization is an urdent need…We must prevent multiplication of this bad stock.”

“Eugenics is…the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of a racial, political, and social problems.”

“The minister’s work is also important and he should be trained perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

-All three quotes are from the racist Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood



The Pro-Life Truth and More on Abortion

Killing unborn babies is murder. Almighty God is on our side. 46,000,000+ human beings since Roe v. Wade are now dead. Innocent blood cries out and God will judge America personally for every abortion committed.

That’s real. Good new spiraling out is that more individuals are waking up. According to a Gallup Poll at 1/21/2001 (reported in the New York Times), folks who considered themselves pro-death declined from 56% to 49%, while those who
align themselves with Pro-Life rose from 33% to 43% in a span of 3 years.

From the same poll, 27% agree to abortion in all circumstances, 16% seek to ban abortion all together, and 55% want abortion banned except cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother. Therefore, most Americans take up a Pro-Life point of view even if they don’t classify themselves as “pro-life.”

More and more teens just refuse to accept pro-choice leis as well. We’re winning and do you want to know why? It’s all about education. I’ve been pro-life since I was a teenager (nearly all my life) and many organizations that abhor this genocide have exposed N.A.R.A.L., partial birth abortion, and other Pro-Life literature are moving society to be Pro-Life.

That’s glorious. Let’s not forget the valued truths that all innocent life should be protected, a fetus is a human being, choice is never unlimited, and a baby in a womb deserves not even death for it’s inside a woman’s body. We are inspired to do the right thing. There are those who oppose all forms of abortion except to save the life of the mother. They are in the Pro-Life Truth movement, but I have a different perspective.

To save the life of the mother is so rare that it’s virtually none existent. In such a situation, it’s still wrong to intentionally kill the child or the mother, but you should use all steps to save the mother and the child equally within all medical means at your disposal. A physician or doctor must do all things possible to save both.

For rape and incest, abortion is out of the question to be executed. Those horrific events account for only 1% of all abortions and an innocent unborn child (a third party) need not to suffer for the crimes of others at all. Brutalizing an innocent human being will not equate a solution or justice to a crime.

Many folks who are a product of rape or incest have lead productive lives. Do they deserve to die even if they are innocent and committed no crime? Of course not. Abortion isn’t a safe procedure. Abortion increases maternal death for later pregnancies.

Even the WHO (World Health Organization) mentioned that 500 women died daily from abortion in the 1990’s. After abortion, a woman face injuries to the uterus, cervi x, urinary tract, heart failure, brain damage, blood clots, and even death.

(Women are 4X more likely to die in the year following their abortion) Women suffer mental health declines after abortion, while those who deliver their child actually experienced improved mental health.

Safe and abortion aren’t in the same vocabulary. In the end, we will win this battle. We must speak out echoing the call for the preservation of all innocent life. Fear never enters my mind about this moral issue. This is not about Democrats or Republicans. It’s not about conservatives or liberals, but life and death.

Determined murder persisting, brutal lies perpetrated by Planned Parenthood, N.A.R.A.L., N.O.W., and other hacks of the globalists, and other follies will never relinquish the fight to end all abortion. It strengthens my zeal and my ultimate passion to prevent innocent blood being shed. There is a long way to go. All unborn life is a gift from Almighty God with a plan and a purpose. Abortion is an abomination.





Dismembered child


Adolf Hitler Supported Abortion


 


This is the undisputed fact that Planned Parenthood, N.A.R.A.L., N.O.W., the Illuminati, and especially the bias mainstream media refuses to show to the public. Adolf Hitler was pro-choice and supported Abortion. Gloria Steinem, CIA Feminist agent, smilingly believed that Hitler was Pro-life in 1980 by her quote:

Hitler himself and the Nazi doctrine he created were unequivocally opposed to any individual right to abortion.” (Gloria Steinem, Ms., October 1980). Ha ha ha ah ha!!!!! How wrong she was. Here’s the smoking gun of the direct words from Hitler subscribing to abortion:

“The Slavs are to work for us. Insofar as we don’t need them, they may die. Therefore compulsory vaccination and German health services are superfluous. The fertility of the Slavs is undesirable. They may use contraceptives and practice abortion, the more the better. Education is dangerous. It is sufficient if they can count up to a hundred. At best education is admissible which produces useful servants for us. Every educated person is a future energy. Religion we leave to them as a means of diversion. As to food, they are not to get more than necessary. We are the masters.” (Gerald Reitlinger, The House Built on Sand; the Conflicts of German Policy in Russia, 1939-1945 [New York]; 1960, p. 200)




Hitler always supported all forms of abortion except for Aryan women, which Hitler wanted his racist plans for a “master race” which there is no such thing. (All races are equal and all human beings are created by Almighty God) As early as 1933 [when the Nazis came to power], the law was changed to legalize abortion and the details were left to the Berlin Chambers of Physicians, Germany’s most vociferous abortion and vociferous group back then.

This group used the fake guise of “the health of the mother” to execute abortion. “The health of the mother” isn’t just life or death, but raical, ecomonic, or psychological factors which is extremely grosteque. Dr. Frederick J. Taussig explains this accurately:

“The struggle to have therapeutic indications for abortion (done by a physician) legally recognized did not meet with success until 1933, when the new enactments passed by the Hitler government established that abortion under genuine medical indications is not subject to punishment when demanded and performed by legally qualified physicians.” (Abortion spontaneous and Induced: Medical and Social Aspects by Dr. Frederick J. Tausssig, pg. 424 in 1936)

Taussig was an obstetrics professor at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri and he promoted abortion as far back as the 1930’s so this quote isn’t bias towards the Pro-Life movement. By 1935, in Nazi Germany (Third Reich) with a population of 65 million people, 500,000 abortions were performed each year. On November 25, 1939 shortly after the occupation of Nazi SS organization called Reich Commission for Strengthening of Germandom (RKFDV) issued this decree:

“All measures which have the tendency to limit the births are to be tolerated or to be supported.
Abortion in the remaining area [of Poland] must be declared free from punishment. The means for abortion and contraceptive means may be offered publicly without police restriction. Homosexuality is always to be declared legal. The institutions and persons involved professionally in abortion practices are not to be interfered with by police.” (Kamenetsky, "German Lebensraum," 171.)

This policy was confirmed on May 27, 1941 at a Ministry of the Interior conference in Berlin. Another Nazi decree of 1941 (October 19, 1941) established abortion on demand as the offical policy of Poland. Hitler even threatened to shoot anyone who restricted abortion unto the Polish population by his own words:

"If any such idiot tried to put into practice such an order. . . he would personally shoot him up. In view of the large families of the native population, it could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as possible."( Alexander Dallin, German Rule in Russia, 1941-1945 (London, 1957), 141f. Clarissa Henry and Marc Hillel, _Of Pure Blood_, Trans. Eric Mossbacher (New York, 1976), 148. Ihor Kamenetsky, "German Lebensraum Policy in Eastern Europe During World War II" (Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Ill., 1957) (Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilm, # 25,236), 172-73, Ihor Kamenetsky, _Secret Nazi Plans for Eastern Europe_ (New York, 1961), 143, Joachim C. Fest, _Hitler_ (New York, 1975), 683-84.)

Hitler just wanted abortions to be expanded to all populations under the control of “the Ministry of the Occupied Terroritories of the East.” Hitler accomphlished that by his July 23, 1942 decree which extended abortions to other parts of Eastern Europe. Hitler cofirmed his order on August 5.

On June 9, 1943, he issued an order to the SS, SD, and the police which was the Reichskommisar Kaltenbrummer to have abortions for Eastern Female workers if they desired it especially if non-Aryan racially. Professor William B ennan of the School of Social Science at St. Louis University, in 1983 wrote The Abortion Holocaust exposing the Nazi/Abortion connection published by Landmark Press. He also was the author of Medical Holocausts. His The Abortion Holocaust book conveyed that:

“Individuals such as Gloria Steinem, who have characterized Hitler as unequivocably opposed to abortion, are right then? Not at all. This in only part of the picture, and a minor one at that. Hitler's opposition to abortion possessed a definite ideological flavor: the building of a master race of Aryans. The converse of this, the tearing down of non-Aryans, necessitated a strong pro-abortion mindset [for non-Aryans]. ....." (p. 33)

It is also obvious that the Nazis practiced eugenics, forced sterlization, and euthanasia along with abortion leading to the genocide of 20 million+ human beings. After WW II, the War crimes Tribunal indicted 10 Nazi leaders for “encouraging and compelling abortion” which is considered a “crime against humanity.” (Trials of War Criminals, “Nuremberg Military Tribunal, Washington D.C; USGPO, vol. IV, p. 610)

When the brainwashed pro-choice propagandists classify you as a nut for being Pro-Life and supporting the right of the unborn to live, tell them directly that the procedure of abortion from paganism, witchcraft, Canaan, Celts, Babylon, Nazism, and from Satan himself. Adolf Hitler was pro-choice. The media has never displayed these immensely valuable fact to you for obvious reasons. Abortion is never of God.


 


 





 


Early Feminists Were Pro-Life

These are the facts that Liberal extremists, N.W.O. proponents, and tyrants don’t want you to know. The truth is that the early feminist movement disagreed with abortion. The feminist movement since the 1960’s have been run by extremists like N.O.W. and N.A.R.A.L. that promote an anti-Bible believing Christian agenda to force people to accept illegal acts and immoral activites or be labeled a “hatemonger” or a “bigot.” That’s there plans. The evidence is clear. Here’s some direct quotes from these great women.

Susan B. Anthony’s own words:
"Guilty? Yes. No matter what the motive, love of ease, or a desire to save from suffering the unborn innocent, the woman is awfully guilty who commits the deed . It will burden her conscience in life, it will burden her soul in death; But oh, thrice guilty is he who drove her to the desperation which impelled her to the crime!"

Abortion was referred to as "child murder."
The Revolution, 4(1):4 July 8, 1869

Mattie Brinkerhoff
"When a man steals to satisfy hunger, we may safely conclude that there is something wrong in society - so when a woman destroys the life of her unborn child, it is an evidence that either by education or circumstances she has been greatly wronged."
The Revolution, 4(9):138-9 September 2, 1869

Victoria Woodhull
"Every woman knows that if she were free, she would never bear an unwished-for child, nor think of murdering one before its birth."
Wheeling, West Virginia Evening Standard, November 17, 1875

"Child murderers practice their profession without let or hindrance, and open infant butcheries unquestioned...Is there no remedy for all this ante-natal child murder?...Perhaps there will come a time when...an unmarried mother will not be despised because of her motherhood...and when the right of the unborn to be born will not be denied or interfered with." Woodhull's and Claffin's Weekly, November 19, 1870

Mary Wollstonecraft as early as 1792 in her A Vindication of the Rights of Women
"Women becoming, consequently, weaker...than they ought to be...have not sufficient strength to discharge the first duty of a mother; and sacrificing to lasciviousness the parental affection...either destroy the embryo in the womb, or cast if off when born. Nature in every thing demands respect, and those who violate her laws seldom violate them with impunity."






“I don’t think the culture has changed to the extent that American people or the Congress would totally ban abortions.”
-George W. Bush


“No. I don’t think it should be overtuned.”
-Laura Bush on NBC’s Today show describing Roe v. Wade.

George W. Bush is not Pro-Life

On some cases, Bush had created reasonable measures that are pro-Life, but when the total evidence is put in context, he isn’t pro-life. By his own coments, he never intends to support a total abortion ban during his Presidency. That’s a fact, so don’t expect him doing anything more than the fake so-called partial birth abortion ban.

George W. Bush even in his own stated position on abortion supported s o-called ‘exceptions’ to a ban on partial birth abortion, which is in-utero child killing, violating God’s word in Exodus 20:13 and the 5th Amendment. The only reason Bush passed the so-called partial birth abortion ban because it’s in November 2003, after almost 3 years in office and near the election year of 2004.

Larry Flynt (a disgraceful pornographer) isn’t my cup of tea, but an October 20th interview, Flynt said he had affidavits from 5 women who were connected with George W. Bush’s illegal abortion at Houston in 1970. (which was before Roe v. Wade when Bush worked on his father’s campaign)

This is hypocrisy by Bush since he arranged an abortion himself although he lyingly props himself up as being pro-life. George W. Bush signed legislation appropriating $100 million to the contraceptives for aborticfacients for unmarried adolescents to fornicate.

This same legislation contains over $50 million (es timated) per year in the Title X birth control program given to Planned Parenthood which kills at least 200,000 babies per year (Planned Parenthood admitted to killed 700,000 in 2001 alone).

He’s even given $59 million of our tax dollars to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) late last year. The $15 billion AIDS plan was passed in part funding the killing of innocent children (abortion) overseas. If Bush was really Pro-Life, he would at least spoke openly to wish to see Roe v. Wade be extinct and abortions eliminated, but he hasn’t.

This isn’t odd to me, because George W. Bush is a Satanist and the Illuminati funded abortions for decades through the Rockefellers and Van Duyn. George W. Bush’s Pro-Life front is just conveyed to deceive Christians to follow his tune despite his immoral policies. Christian Pro-Lifers and Constitutionalists just cannot vote for George W. Bush in 2004. That’s all allies.


 


 


 





 


 


 



RU-486

This pill have been dubbed the abortion pill. William Jefferson Clinton first issued it unto Americans on September 28, 2000. This allowed the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) to approve RU-486 for marketing and prescripton in the United States. This monostrity was invented by Dr. Etienre-Emile Baulieu in France. It’s legal in France by 1988 and used in other European countries plus Communist China as well.

China is no surprise since its appalling human rights and religious rights’ abuses with one child polices by forced abortion, contraception, sterilization, infanticide, and death camps by torture. Many abortionists like Eleanor Smeal, Gloria Feldt, and Al Gore all supported Ru-486 as safe and great for women.

Obviously, they are sadly mistaken. The abortion pill is a synthetic steroid that starves the baby to d eath by restricting progesterone (a natural hormone vital to the early stages of pregnancy) to the unborn child by detaching the baby from the wall of the mother’s womb. The baby dies a short time later as a result of resources ending.

There is absolutely a Nazi connection with RU-486. During WWII, Hoescht AG was IG Farben, the Nazi chemical giant known for its production of cynanide gas and Zyklon-B to kill million of people in Hitler’s regime at concentration camps. (i.e. Auschwitz, etc.) IG Farben also performed unethical medical experiments undertaken by Mengele and other S.S. doctors.

IG Farben may change its stripes to Hoescht AG, but a Nazi is still a Nazi if it continues in the Nazi practice of Abortion. Hoescht AG now owns Roussel Uclaf (a company who was once a subsidiary to IG Farben). The negative effects of RU-486 are just blatantly evil.

In U.S. trials, 79-96% of women taking RU-486/PG developed prolonged pain requiring a pin killer, 24-61% experienced nausea. Other side effect are diarrhea, vomiting, infection, skin conditions, breast conditions, very heavy vaginal bleeding, etc. Bleeding can last up to 40 days and dilatoration and curterage is required in many cases.

An ABC News poll at September 6th-10th, 2000 have 45% to 47% opposing RU-486 being legal. Legalized murder couldn’t be more accessible than this destructive pill.



 


 




The Early Church on Abortion

The Bible in the Old Testament and the New Testament are exclusively Pro-Life. This is my exegesis of it. The Holy Bible has God as the Author of Life and that life is in the blood. (Genesis 2:7, Deuteronomy 30:20, Acts 17:25, 28) Only God is entitled to end one's life and to deliberately destroy human life without cause is sin and is punishable by death (Exodus 20:13, Psalm 31:15, Genesis 9:6, Acts 25:11, Matthew 26:52, Romans 1:32, Revelation 13:10, etc.)

Also, the scriptures fully convey the personhood of the unborn. The Bible refers to the unborn as children not "blobs of tissue" or "it" plus the unborn is a separate being apart from the mother. (Luke 1:36, Matthew 1:18, 23, Genesis 25:21-24, etc.)

The Scriptures fully display at Exodus 21:22-25 that if a fight breaks out and a pregnant woman miscarriages with a child coming out, but the child and mother lives, a fine is given for punishment for the man. If anyone is harmed leading to death, whether the child or the mother, then it's life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth proving that the unborn child is a person.

There is no need to abort since God has a plan for all life established at conception. (Pslam 139:13-16, Isaiah 1:5, Jeremiah 1:5, Galatians 1:15) From the Bible, God knew the plan of Jeremiah before being formed in the belly of the womb. God hates the shedding of innocent blood. (Exodus 23:7, Proverbs 6:16-19, Isaiah 5:20-21) To abort a baby is to kill an innocent.

The baby is inside of the womb with a different blood than the mother's, seperate brainwaves, and different human DNA making it seperate and independent from the mother being a person.

God the Son was in Mary's womb. Mary was poor and lived in harsh circumstances so does Mary des erves an abortion possessing the right to choose? Is Jesus inside of Mary's womb, part of Mary's body?

Are the prophets of the OT deserve abortion if their mothers are poor, born out of wedlock, sick mothers, etc. No. Abortion is borderline blasphemy since innocent life is degraded and it disrespects Christ's birth with a poor family being God in the flesh.

Abortion is just directly an interference to the potential of all human life leading to a great life following God. There is a possibilty that the aborted child could be the world's next great leader, but we may never know or witness since that life is gone.


 


 


 





 


There is no Biblical justification for abortion whatsoever. Without further ado, here’s the opinion of the Early Church on Abortion plus Martin Luther and John Calvin opposed abortion as well.

1). 150 AD Didache "The second commandment of the teaching: You shall not murder. You shall not commit adultery. You shall not seduce boys. You shall not commit fornication. You shall not steal. You shall not practice magic. You shall not use potions. You shall not procure [an] abortion, nor destroy a newborn child" (Didache 2:1)

2). 170 AD Mark Felix "There are some women among you who by drinking special potions extinguish the life of the future human in their very bowels, thus committing murder before they even give birth." (Mark Felix, Christian Lawyer, Octavius chap. 30)

3). 177 AD Athenagoras "What man of sound mind, therefo re, will affirm, while such is our character, that we are murderers? . . . [W]hen we say that those women who use drugs to bring on abortion commit murder, and will have to give an account to God for the abortion, on what principle should we commit murder?

For it does not belong to the same person to regard the very fetus in the womb as a created being, and therefore an object of God's care, and when it has passed into life, to kill it; and not to expose an infant, because those who expose them are chargeable with child-murder, and on the other hand, when it has been reared to destroy it" (A Plea for the Christians 35, Embassy chap. 5).

177 AD Athenagoras, "What reason would we have to commit murder when we say that women who induce abortions are murderers, and will have to give account of it to God? For the same person would not regard the fetus in the womb as a living thing and therefore an object of God's care, and at the same time slay it, on ce it had come to life." (Athenagoras Plea, ch.35)

4). 210 AD Tertullian "In our case, a murder being once for all forbidden, we may not destroy even the fetus in the womb, while as yet the human being derives blood from the other parts of the body for its sustenance. To hinder a birth is merely a speedier man-killing; nor does it matter whether you take away a life that is born, or destroy one that is coming to birth. That is a man which is going to be one; you have the fruit already in its seed" (Apology 9:8).

210 AD Tertullian "Now we allow that life begins with conception because we contend that the soul also begins from conception; life taking its commencement at the same moment and place that the soul does" (Apology 27).

210 AD Tertullian "The law of Moses, indeed, punishes with due penalties the man who shall cause abortion [Ex. 21:22]

5). 226 AD Minucius Felix "There are s ome [pagan] women who, by drinking medical preparations, extinguish the source of the future man in their very bowels and thus commit a parricide before they bring forth. And these things assuredly come down from the teaching of your [false] gods. . . . To us [Christians] it is not lawful either to see or hear of homicide" (Octavius 30).

6). 228 AD Hippolytus "Women who were reputed to be believers began to take drugs to render themselves sterile, and to bind themselves tightly so as to expel what was being conceived, since they would not, on account of relatives and excess wealth, want to have a child by a slave or by any insignificant person. See, then, into what great impiety that lawless one has proceeded, by teaching adultery and murder at the same time!" (Refutation of All Heresies).





9313PB_B.JPG (7042 bytes)


 


 



Partial birth Abortion


 


 




This injustice must no go unexposed. Partial birth abortion is a measure so obviously barbaric that even many pro-choice advocates oppose it. An outline of the whole sequences entails this:

-The womb is guided by an ultrasound, then the abortionist murderer get the baby's legs with forceps.
-The baby's legs are pulled out into the birth canal, and then the baby's entire body is delivered except the head.
-The abortionist jammed the baby's skull with scissors, opens a hole, and sucks the baby's brain out with a suction catheter.
-The skull collapses soon later and the dead baby are then removed for possible body part sells, Illuminati Satanic cannibalistic sacrifice rituals, etc.

Most of the babies died by 20 weeks (4 1/2 months after conception) and even as late as the 2nd or 3rd Trimester to full term (4 weeks). This is very sick!!!!! Manly healthy babies are affected not doomed babies said by pro-abortion groups.

It's never safe as even admitted by prominent doctors. Dr. Warren Hern, author f the late term abortion medical text said, "I would dispute any statement that this is the safest procedure to use. The procedure can cause amniotic fluid embolism or placental abruption." (AMA News, November 10, 1995, p.3)




Dr. Pamela Smith, Director of Medical Education, Department of Ob-Gyn at Mt. Sinai Hospital in Chicago has stated "There are absolutely no obstetrical situations encountered in this country which require partial abortion to preserve the life or the health of the mother." Dr. Pamela Smith also mentioned 2 other risks of partial birth abortion including:


1). Cervical incompetence in subsequent pregnancies caused by three days of forceful dilation of the cervix.
2). Uterine rupture caused by rotating the fetus in the womb.

Joseph DeCook, founder of PHACT (Physicians Ad Hoc Coalition for Truth) and an Ob/Gyn mentioned that partial birth abortion is an unsafe act carried out by maverick doctors which could lead to sterility by infection and tearing or puncturing the uterus (which can cause the mother to bleed to death in 10 minutes).
This immoral action isn't necessary to proceed since according to a 1999 report by the Federal Center for Disease Control, less than 2% of abortions are done after the 5th month. A 2000 report by the Guttmacher Institute stated that less than 20% of 1% of all abortions are partial-birth abortions.

Now the partial birth abortion bill was passed overwhelmingly of a majority of the House and Senate supporting it. Now Section 1351 of the law doesn't ban partial birth abortion to save the life of the mother, illness, physical injury life-threatening condition, etc. Words like "illness" or "physical injury" are so ambiguous that an abortion can still be performed under limited circumstances.

Despite the "banning" of infanticide, pro-death advocates still are against it and a federal court struck down this law. This is a half-empty law though since it gives too much leave way to perform partial birth abortions with narrow exceptions of ill ness and physical injury. George W. Bush hasn't strongly taken on that federal court to support the passed law.

One child is not saved as a result of this law so far. Many evangelical Christian leaders are praising the law like Carrie Earll, Sandy Rios, Rand Land, Jerry Falwell (Southern Baptist), Dr. James Dobson, Pat Robertson, and Phillis Schafly.

Evangelicals are great God-fearing people, but their leadership is controlled by the globalist ecumenicals and their leadership are also manipulated by "Rev." Sun Moon (a Korean Satanist) using this to promote the N.W.O.

The vast majority of Americans oppose partial birth abortion. A July 24, 2003 ABC News poll outlined that 62% of Americans support a partial birth abortion ban, but 61% say it should be legal to save the life of the mother.

Just only 20 % of Americans believe it should be legal in all circumstances. T he pro-choice advocates just have no case for partial just like for all abortions regardless of their lies, exaggerations, emotionalism, and spin. We're on the winning side. We're on God's side.


 


 






 


Abortion and Breast Cancer

These are just the facts from: www.abortiontv.com/Breast...ortion.htm

:

Women have the right to know that there are now 27 out of 34 worldwide studies (from among those 13 out of 14 were American studies) which show a link between induced abortion and breast cancer, seventeen of which are statistically significant, and most of which have been done by abortion supporters.

The first study was published in an English publication in 1957 and focused on Japanese women. It sh owed a 2.6 or 160% increased risk of breast cancer among women who had had an induced abortion. [Segi et al. (1957) GANN 48 (Suppl.):1-63]

Abortion is an "elective surgical procedure and a woman’s exposure to the hormones of early pregnancy -- if it is interrupted -- is so great, that just one interrupted pregnancy is enough to make a significant difference in her risk" (Professor Joel Brind, President, Breast Cancer Prevention Institute, Endeavour Forum Public Meeting, August 24, 1999, Malvern, Victoria, Australia).

The American Cancer Society has stated in its fact sheet that abortion "may be associated with increased breast cancer risk" {American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts & Figures --1996, at 12 (1996)}. (An employee of the American Cancer Society with the Office of Corporation Counsel has asked us to remove the Society's 1996 statement from our web site. We have contacted the Society and asked them to inform us of the legal basis for th eir request, if any.)

Dr. Janet Daling, an abortion supporter, and her colleagues at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center were commissioned by the National Cancer Institute to do a study on the abortion-breast cancer link. The study found that, "among women who had been pregnant at least once, the risk of breast cancer in those who had experienced an induced abortion was 50% higher than among other women."

It was also reported that women under the age of 18 or over the age of 29 who obtained induced abortions had more than a twofold increase in risk. Women with a family history of breast cancer who procured an abortion were reported to have statistically significant risk increases of 80 percent. Teenagers under age 18 with a family history breast cancer who procured abortions had an incalculably high risk increase.

Because American women already face a lifetime risk of developing breast cancer of about 12 percent, the increase d risk from a single induced abortion is comparable to the risk of lung cancer from long-term heavy smoking. However, not all women who have had abortions will get breast cancer, and not all women who have breast cancer have had abortions.

There is one more way in which abortion increases the risk of breast cancer. Medical experts universally agree that it is healthier for a married woman not to postpone her first full-term pregnancy.

One Harvard study reported that each year that a woman postpones her first full-term pregnancy increases her breast cancer risk by 3.5%. [Dr. Brian MacMahon, Dr. Dimitrios Trichopoulos, et al., “Age at any Birth and Breast Cancer Risk,” International Journal of Cancer, 1983;31:701704].

An abortion causes a woman to forego the benefit of increased protection from breast cancer resulting from an earlier first full-term pregnancy.

World Health Organization scientists in 1970 confirmed this sayin g that, "It is estimated that women having their first child when aged under 18 years have only about one-third the breast cancer risk of those whose first birth is delayed until the age of 35 years or more." (MacMahon B, et al. Bull Wld Health Org, 1970; 43-209-21).

By TruthSeeker24

SOLA SCRIPTURA
SOLA FIDE
SOLA GRATIA
SOLA GLORIA DEO
SOLA CHRISTO

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
SEMPER LIBER

February 26, 2004
12:42 pm. EST


YOU CAN PRINT AND SHOW THIS TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE WAKING PEOPLE UP ABOUT ABORTION AND TO CHURCHES AS WELL


GOOD LUCK ALLIES.

The Descredited Neo Cons



 


The Neo-Conservative Movement Exposed

Ambivalence never roams with them. People either agree or disagree with the neo-conservatives. Neo-cons are frauds and one of many threats to America endangering this country and the world. Media outlets like MSNBC and especially FOX just welcomes their company and opinions in brainwashing the populace.

They are just neither neo nor conservative, but a band of visionaries who seek a false vision of unrestrained war and Big Government. Many of the ideas of the neo-cons flourished from Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson such as internationalism instead of nationalism, interventionism, and unnecessary policies. Even neo-conservative spokesman Max Boost (a member of the Council of Foreign Relations) bragged that he advocates a “Hard Wilsonism policy.”

When he wa s on C-Span at late 2003, I have to respect the callers who rightfully exposed his fraud political ideology and his “chicken hawk” associates.

The man who first revolutionized the neo-conservative agenda was Professor Leo Strauss in the 1960’s who taught at the University of Chicago. He also supported Machiavelli’s writings by writing a book called “Thoughts on Machiavelli” promoting that the ends justify the means.

Even neo-con Michael Ledeen wrote a 1999 book favorable to Machiavelli the Ron Paul exposed it in his speech Neo-Conned on July 10, 2003. Many of the famous modern neo-conservatives were influenced by Strauss include individuals like Paul Wolfowitz (who had a Ph.D Dunder Strauss), John Ashcroft, etc.

Irving Kristol (the father of the infamous Bill Kristol) was the godfather of the modern day neo-conservative movement when in the 1983 publication of Reflection of a Neo-C onservative, which defends a liberal position on welfare. Well, what is an outline of their beliefs? A good run down are these:

*A new strategy for illegal preemptive war since they love imperialism in search for the Global Pax Americana (the American Empire)

*Maintain Constant Revoluion as Trotsky Subscribed to therefore the neo-cons are Comunists and Socialists. Many neo-cons like George H. W. Bush and Margaret Thatcher are part of the International Democratic Union (IDU) that promotes permanent revolution, a self-regulating classless society or a global free market system=Fabian socialism. David Horowitz and Ann Coulter refuses to this day to discuss the IDU elaborately.

*Force American Ideals unto Sovereign Nations even by force and even if those nations don’t threaten our National Security. They feel that war must extend beyond the defense of our country. The neo-cons just execute preemptive war while ignoring the Christian truth of a just war.

*They have unconditional support for Israel (aside note: I support Israel, but not the tactics of Muslim extremists killing innocent Israelis neither Zionist extremists treating Palestianians wrongfully) and have a close alliance with the Likud Party (one of the many modern day Nazis who killed Yitzhah Rabin along with the CFR since this Freemason Rabin wanted real peace in the Middle East). The neo-cons want to redesign the Middle East up in their own image.

*Many neo-conservatives were once liberals like Christopher Hitchens. (who was once liberal then turned neo-con)

*Their foreign policies are more militant, aggressive, and non-cooperative. They follow no neutrality in most instances, which should be done.

*The also support attacks on basic civil liberties by passing illegal laws like the Patriot Act, Homeland SSecurity, etc. The neo-cons hate libertari ans, conservatives, liberals, and independents that strongly fight for our God-given rights given as a birthright to every human being.

*Neo-conservatives endorse big centralized government, a permanent welfare state with no improvement of the poor, massive deficits, and big spending obviously.

Offshoots of this movement include think tanks and projects to promote their agenda. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) (a product of the Bradley Foundation) is just one organization dedicated to the neo-con cause.








 


The Project for A New American Century

There is nothing more to describe this plan as the 21st century Mein Kampf and a plot for global domination. This project was made up of neo-conservatives who seek transform America into unending war with the aspirations of an empire to preserve American leadership in the world. Participants on this project came from the RAND Corporation, Harvard University, Carnegie Corporation, John Hopkins University, and military figures form the U.S. Navy War College.

The founders of the Project for A New American Century (PNAC) were Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, (Deputy of Defense), I. Lewis Libby, William Bennett, and Zalmay Khalilzad (Bush’s ambassador to Afghanistan). The PNAC crated a September 2000 report for Rumsfeld, Jeb Bush, Cheney, and Lewis Libby. This report was entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces, and Resources For a New Century” containing the goals to:

a). Control the International Commons of cyberspace (control the Internet)
b). Create a global missile defense system to control outer space.
c). Democratized China and deal with Saddam

etc.

British Labour MP Tim Dalyell (of the House of Commons) described this document as: “This is a blueprint for U.S. world domination-a new world order of their making. These are the thought processes of fantasist Americans who want to control the world. I am appalled that a British Labour Minister should have got in bed with a crew which has this moral standing.” He’s right and the most weirdest comment is this: “Further, the process of transformation, eve n if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing even-like a new Pearl Harbor.”

Now this was mentioned a year before 9/11 and they wanted a Pearl Harbor like event to accelerate their aims. 9/11 was the new Pearl Harbor and behold we have Afghanistan and Iraq with acquired natural resources, puppet leadership, and constant, unending warfare. Could Iran, Syria, or North Korea be invaded next by these imperialists?

Neo-conservatives today include Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, William Kristol, Bill Bennett, Eliot Abrams, former CIA director James Woolsey, Richard Perle, etc. who propagandize their lies daily.


By TruthSeeker24


SOLA SCRIPTURA


SOLA FIDE


SOLA GLORIA DEO


SOLA CHRISTO


SOLA GRATIA


SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS


SEMPER LIBER

The Overpopulation Myth (I written this from 2004)





The Overpopulation Myth



So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created him; male and female created them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.” (Genesis 1:27-28)

*The United Nations wanted this folly from their won words:

"The United Nation’s goal is to reduce population selectively by encouraging abortion, forced sterilization, and control human reproduction, and regards two- thirds of the human population as excess baggage, with 350,000 people to be eliminated per day." (Jacques Cousteau[he’s dead now], UNESCO Courier, November 1991.)



We need population growth not population control never embracing the myth of overpopulation. The resources on Ea rth are plentiful and beautiful plus extremism should be eliminated. People should be fruitful and multiply if they can as Almighty God, which is in Heaven commands us to do.

To refute these lies of population control is perfectly easy. Dr. Jacqueline R. Kasun, Julian Simon, Professor Collin Clark, and other experts maintain the opinion of population growth.

The first argument against population growth is that the world is overcrowded and population growth is adding overwhelming numbers of humans to a small planet.

The truth is that people then crowd to places like cities and villages in order to exchange goods and services with one another. Just because people are overcrowded in select areas of the Earth doesn’t mean that most of the world is not empty.





Paul Ehrich and others stated that human beings actually occupy no more than 1 to 3 percent of the land surface.

At 2003, there were 6,301,999,470 people worldwide and counting. If you give 6 billion people on the planet with 1,000 square feet each, it could easy fit into the state of Texas with over 1.3 billion square feet left over. Look at this representation to see the information more clearly.

Texas has 262,015 square miles of land and that’s 7,304,558,976,000 square feet equaling this=

Square feet in Texas (7,304,558,976,000)- Square feet needed for 6 billion people (1,000 sq.
Ft. per person) (6,000,000,000,000)= Leftover of 1,304,558,976,000

*Even with basic discrepancies give or take thousands of square miles, that’s still is a sm all portion of the total land areas of Planet Earth making the overpopulation view really extremist, and exaggeration, and just fake. It was Thomas Malthus who was one of the first people to embrace population control in his Essay on the Principle of Population, and then his doctrine was passed on to Darwin [whose father was a Freemason] and Margaret Sanger (occultic drug addict).


In Communist China, they are never too crowded since they follow the insane one child to one family program, which is supported by the Communist U.N. So, Communist China can act in forced abortion, killing of female babies, and prison time for anyone resisting it along with the Persecution of independent Christians in China.

According to the Population Division contends that “Over the period 1961-1998 world per capita food available for human consumption increased by 24% and there is enough f ood for everyone on the planet to be adequately nourished.”





All statistics show that although the total world population continues to increase, that rate is now beginning to decline since the 1970’s:


“From 1960-1970, the world population growth was
22.0%
-Then from 1970-1980, it was 20.2%
-Then from 1980-1990, the population growth of the world was 18.4%
-Now the total world population growth from 1990-2000 is only 15.2%” (from
www.overpopulation.com/fa...tions.html ) www.ncpa.org/pd/pdint21.html , www.albalagh.net/populati...ion.shtml, www.otherside.net/overpop.htm , forums.prolife.org.ph/yab...readid=150 , and other website expose the overpopulation myth. The decline has accelerated in the 1990’s. By 2055, the world population is expected to reach 9 billion people. The population growth decline appears to come from woman choosing to have fewer children.


Also, food production has increased since the 1970’s making food resources very limitless. Dr. Osterfeld, Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s College in Rensselor, Indiana concludes that although there are now more people in the world than ever bef ore, “by any meaningful measure the world is actually becoming less populated.”

Various studies proved that poverty and underdevelopment has no direct link to population growth per se. The problem could be internal (poor political/economic administrative corruption, health, educational) or external.

The fact is that the hungry are hungry because land is taken from people, many people can’t earn enough to survive, some have it by no fault of their own, or a natural limit on food production. The Illuminati’s IMF and World Bank are contributing to the Third World’s poverty plight.

The study by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in the United States concluded in its 1986 report that it is misleading to equate poverty with population growth.

The study was confirmed by IIRPD (Independent Inquiry Report into Population and Development) commissioned by the Australian government in 1994 said that there is a positive cor relation between population growth and sustainable development.


The Illuminati, following in Margaret Sanger’s footsteps, is presenting population control as a way to decrease the world population from the billions to even the millions [like 500,000,000 as planned by the Georgia Guide stones and other evil Illuminists like Maurice Strong, Ted Turner, and Prince Phillip] to form their New World Order. Planned Parenthood have always supported population control in their Global Vision Project from 1994 and:

Planned Parenthood is heavily involved in the UNFPA -The United Nations Population Fund. PP lobbies for unrestricted abortion -yes including partial birth abortions- to be legal and open for all countries worldwide. PP staff are often members, employee's and appointees in UNFPA.” (From
www.abortionismurder.org/pp.shtml )


Abortion, population control, eugenics, New Age Movement, Nazism, Satanism, sterilization, and humanism are tied together and we taxpayers give these murderers from Planned Parenthood millions of dollars per year to promote their folly. The Illuminati will try to decrease the world population and crowd the rest of us in crowded cities.


They will live in their utopian centers. They can only accomplish this sick goal through war, disease, biospheres, and more control over human beings.

The Fake Leftist Ted Turner even admitted that he wanted to eliminate 95% of the world’s population in an interview he gave to Audubon:
A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels would be ideal.” (Ted Turner quoted by Bruce Stutz in Ted Turner Turns It On”, Audubon, November-December 1991”)




Genocidal and homicidal lunatics of the Illuminati want to kill us in the range of 85-90% to form the New World Order at the expense of keeping the world for themselves. George H. W. Bush, who is a pedophile, MJ-12, Skulls and Bones, Committee of 300, Pilgrim Society member, Bilderberger Group, Trilateral Commission, and a Knight of Malta attended a secret conference at the Fairmont Hotel in California keynoted by New Age Freemason Gorbachev at September 27, 1995 where it was decided that the world’s population must be rolled back from 6 billion to 900 million!!!!!!

Population growth in Europe is near 0% and have 25% of the world’s p opulation and by 2050, it will have nearly 7%. Population growth in the Caribbean fell from 2.75% in 1960-1965 to 1.70% in 1990-1995. These murderers want to talk about Africa. Africa is one of the least densely populated areas with about ½ as many per square mile as in the world as a whole.





The racist Illuminati seeks to destroy the population of Africa (especially it Black African citizens) for extermination mentioned in their own documents and speeches. Many Third World nation having bad governments propped up ineptly and wrongly managed foreign aid is the root of the strife not out of control population growth.

The Third World and people worldwide can use oxygen ozone, light with color therapy, ultraviolet blood irradiation, and direct current generators using both photons and electrons to help AIDS, HIV, and other diseases. The government has suppressed all of these technologies.

The government has killed many users of this in America and only a few brave people ar e using this technology and helping others. State Rep. Maralyn Chase (Democrat) at February 2004 seeks to make 2 child per house as part of an option in a bill called “Two or Fewer” bill in Washington State of brainwashing people of the benefits of having 2 children. This is in America of creeping control. Population growth is of God and I welcome it 100%.

By TruthSeeker24

SOLA SCRIPTURA
SOLA FIDE
SOLA GLORIA DEO
SOLA CHRISTO
SOLA GRATIA

SIC SEMPER TRYANNIS
SEMPER LIBER

February 13, 2004