“ I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing; therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live.” (Deuteronomy 30:19)
“These six things the LORD hates, yes, seven are an abomination to Him; A proud look, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, A heart that devises wicked plans, feet that are swift to in running to evil, A false witness who speak lies, and one who sows discord among bethren.” (Proverbs 6:16-19)
“They shed innocent blood, the blood of their sons and their daughters…and the land was polluted with blood…” (Pslams 106:38)
“We hold these truth to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by the Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Puruit of Happiness.”
-The Declaration of Independence (Ju ly 4, 1776)
“Eugenic sterelization is an urdent need…We must prevent multiplication of this bad stock.”
“Eugenics is…the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of a racial, political, and social problems.”
“The minister’s work is also important and he should be trained perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
-All three quotes are from the racist Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood
The Pro-Life Truth and More on AbortionKilling unborn babies is murder. Almighty God is on our side. 46,000,000+ human beings since Roe v. Wade are now dead. Innocent blood cries out and God will judge America personally for every abortion committed.
That’s real. Good new spiraling out is that more individuals are waking up. According to a Gallup Poll at 1/21/2001 (reported in the New York Times), folks who considered themselves pro-death declined from 56% to 49%, while those who align themselves with Pro-Life rose from 33% to 43% in a span of 3 years.
From the same poll, 27% agree to abortion in all circumstances, 16% seek to ban abortion all together, and 55% want abortion banned except cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother. Therefore, most Americans take up a Pro-Life point of view even if they don’t classify themselves as “pro-life.”
More and more teens just refuse to accept pro-choice leis as well. We’re winning and do you want to know why? It’s all about education. I’ve been pro-life since I was a teenager (nearly all my life) and many organizations that abhor this genocide have exposed N.A.R.A.L., partial birth abortion, and other Pro-Life literature are moving society to be Pro-Life.
That’s glorious. Let’s not forget the valued truths that all innocent life should be protected, a fetus is a human being, choice is never unlimited, and a baby in a womb deserves not even death for it’s inside a woman’s body. We are inspired to do the right thing. There are those who oppose all forms of abortion except to save the life of the mother. They are in the Pro-Life Truth movement, but I have a different perspective.
To save the life of the mother is so rare that it’s virtually none existent. In such a situation, it’s still wrong to intentionally kill the child or the mother, but you should use all steps to save the mother and the child equally within all medical means at your disposal. A physician or doctor must do all things possible to save both.
For rape and incest, abortion is out of the question to be executed. Those horrific events account for only 1% of all abortions and an innocent unborn child (a third party) need not to suffer for the crimes of others at all. Brutalizing an innocent human being will not equate a solution or justice to a crime.
Many folks who are a product of rape or incest have lead productive lives. Do they deserve to die even if they are innocent and committed no crime? Of course not. Abortion isn’t a safe procedure. Abortion increases maternal death for later pregnancies.
Even the WHO (World Health Organization) mentioned that 500 women died daily from abortion in the 1990’s. After abortion, a woman face injuries to the uterus, cervi x, urinary tract, heart failure, brain damage, blood clots, and even death.
(Women are 4X more likely to die in the year following their abortion) Women suffer mental health declines after abortion, while those who deliver their child actually experienced improved mental health.
Safe and abortion aren’t in the same vocabulary. In the end, we will win this battle. We must speak out echoing the call for the preservation of all innocent life. Fear never enters my mind about this moral issue. This is not about Democrats or Republicans. It’s not about conservatives or liberals, but life and death.
Determined murder persisting, brutal lies perpetrated by Planned Parenthood, N.A.R.A.L., N.O.W., and other hacks of the globalists, and other follies will never relinquish the fight to end all abortion. It strengthens my zeal and my ultimate passion to prevent innocent blood being shed. There is a long way to go. All unborn life is a gift from Almighty God with a plan and a purpose. Abortion is an abomination.
Adolf Hitler Supported Abortion
This is the undisputed fact that Planned Parenthood, N.A.R.A.L., N.O.W., the Illuminati, and especially the bias mainstream media refuses to show to the public. Adolf Hitler was pro-choice and supported Abortion. Gloria Steinem, CIA Feminist agent, smilingly believed that Hitler was Pro-life in 1980 by her quote:
“Hitler himself and the Nazi doctrine he created were unequivocally opposed to any individual right to abortion.” (Gloria Steinem, Ms., October 1980). Ha ha ha ah ha!!!!! How wrong she was. Here’s the smoking gun of the direct words from Hitler subscribing to abortion:
“The Slavs are to work for us. Insofar as we don’t need them, they may die. Therefore compulsory vaccination and German health services are superfluous. The fertility of the Slavs is undesirable. They may use contraceptives and practice abortion, the more the better. Education is dangerous. It is sufficient if they can count up to a hundred. At best education is admissible which produces useful servants for us. Every educated person is a future energy. Religion we leave to them as a means of diversion. As to food, they are not to get more than necessary. We are the masters.” (Gerald Reitlinger, The House Built on Sand; the Conflicts of German Policy in Russia, 1939-1945 [New York]; 1960, p. 200)
Hitler always supported all forms of abortion except for Aryan women, which Hitler wanted his racist plans for a “master race” which there is no such thing. (All races are equal and all human beings are created by Almighty God) As early as 1933 [when the Nazis came to power], the law was changed to legalize abortion and the details were left to the Berlin Chambers of Physicians, Germany’s most vociferous abortion and vociferous group back then.
This group used the fake guise of “the health of the mother” to execute abortion. “The health of the mother” isn’t just life or death, but raical, ecomonic, or psychological factors which is extremely grosteque. Dr. Frederick J. Taussig explains this accurately:
“The struggle to have therapeutic indications for abortion (done by a physician) legally recognized did not meet with success until 1933, when the new enactments passed by the Hitler government established that abortion under genuine medical indications is not subject to punishment when demanded and performed by legally qualified physicians.” (Abortion spontaneous and Induced: Medical and Social Aspects by Dr. Frederick J. Tausssig, pg. 424 in 1936)
Taussig was an obstetrics professor at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri and he promoted abortion as far back as the 1930’s so this quote isn’t bias towards the Pro-Life movement. By 1935, in Nazi Germany (Third Reich) with a population of 65 million people, 500,000 abortions were performed each year. On November 25, 1939 shortly after the occupation of Nazi SS organization called Reich Commission for Strengthening of Germandom (RKFDV) issued this decree:
“All measures which have the tendency to limit the births are to be tolerated or to be supported. Abortion in the remaining area [of Poland] must be declared free from punishment. The means for abortion and contraceptive means may be offered publicly without police restriction. Homosexuality is always to be declared legal. The institutions and persons involved professionally in abortion practices are not to be interfered with by police.” (Kamenetsky, "German Lebensraum," 171.)
This policy was confirmed on May 27, 1941 at a Ministry of the Interior conference in Berlin. Another Nazi decree of 1941 (October 19, 1941) established abortion on demand as the offical policy of Poland. Hitler even threatened to shoot anyone who restricted abortion unto the Polish population by his own words:
"If any such idiot tried to put into practice such an order. . . he would personally shoot him up. In view of the large families of the native population, it could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as possible."( Alexander Dallin, German Rule in Russia, 1941-1945 (London, 1957), 141f. Clarissa Henry and Marc Hillel, _Of Pure Blood_, Trans. Eric Mossbacher (New York, 1976), 148. Ihor Kamenetsky, "German Lebensraum Policy in Eastern Europe During World War II" (Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Ill., 1957) (Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilm, # 25,236), 172-73, Ihor Kamenetsky, _Secret Nazi Plans for Eastern Europe_ (New York, 1961), 143, Joachim C. Fest, _Hitler_ (New York, 1975), 683-84.)
Hitler just wanted abortions to be expanded to all populations under the control of “the Ministry of the Occupied Terroritories of the East.” Hitler accomphlished that by his July 23, 1942 decree which extended abortions to other parts of Eastern Europe. Hitler cofirmed his order on August 5.
On June 9, 1943, he issued an order to the SS, SD, and the police which was the Reichskommisar Kaltenbrummer to have abortions for Eastern Female workers if they desired it especially if non-Aryan racially. Professor William B ennan of the School of Social Science at St. Louis University, in 1983 wrote The Abortion Holocaust exposing the Nazi/Abortion connection published by Landmark Press. He also was the author of Medical Holocausts. His The Abortion Holocaust book conveyed that:
“Individuals such as Gloria Steinem, who have characterized Hitler as unequivocably opposed to abortion, are right then? Not at all. This in only part of the picture, and a minor one at that. Hitler's opposition to abortion possessed a definite ideological flavor: the building of a master race of Aryans. The converse of this, the tearing down of non-Aryans, necessitated a strong pro-abortion mindset [for non-Aryans]. ....." (p. 33)
It is also obvious that the Nazis practiced eugenics, forced sterlization, and euthanasia along with abortion leading to the genocide of 20 million+ human beings. After WW II, the War crimes Tribunal indicted 10 Nazi leaders for “encouraging and compelling abortion” which is considered a “crime against humanity.” (Trials of War Criminals, “Nuremberg Military Tribunal, Washington D.C; USGPO, vol. IV, p. 610)
When the brainwashed pro-choice propagandists classify you as a nut for being Pro-Life and supporting the right of the unborn to live, tell them directly that the procedure of abortion from paganism, witchcraft, Canaan, Celts, Babylon, Nazism, and from Satan himself. Adolf Hitler was pro-choice. The media has never displayed these immensely valuable fact to you for obvious reasons. Abortion is never of God.
Early Feminists Were Pro-Life
These are the facts that Liberal extremists, N.W.O. proponents, and tyrants don’t want you to know. The truth is that the early feminist movement disagreed with abortion. The feminist movement since the 1960’s have been run by extremists like N.O.W. and N.A.R.A.L. that promote an anti-Bible believing Christian agenda to force people to accept illegal acts and immoral activites or be labeled a “hatemonger” or a “bigot.” That’s there plans. The evidence is clear. Here’s some direct quotes from these great women.
Susan B. Anthony’s own words:
"Guilty? Yes. No matter what the motive, love of ease, or a desire to save from suffering the unborn innocent, the woman is awfully guilty who commits the deed . It will burden her conscience in life, it will burden her soul in death; But oh, thrice guilty is he who drove her to the desperation which impelled her to the crime!"
Abortion was referred to as "child murder."
The Revolution, 4(1):4 July 8, 1869
Mattie Brinkerhoff
"When a man steals to satisfy hunger, we may safely conclude that there is something wrong in society - so when a woman destroys the life of her unborn child, it is an evidence that either by education or circumstances she has been greatly wronged."
The Revolution, 4(9):138-9 September 2, 1869
Victoria Woodhull
"Every woman knows that if she were free, she would never bear an unwished-for child, nor think of murdering one before its birth."
Wheeling, West Virginia Evening Standard, November 17, 1875
"Child murderers practice their profession without let or hindrance, and open infant butcheries unquestioned...Is there no remedy for all this ante-natal child murder?...Perhaps there will come a time when...an unmarried mother will not be despised because of her motherhood...and when the right of the unborn to be born will not be denied or interfered with." Woodhull's and Claffin's Weekly, November 19, 1870
Mary Wollstonecraft as early as 1792 in her A Vindication of the Rights of Women
"Women becoming, consequently, weaker...than they ought to be...have not sufficient strength to discharge the first duty of a mother; and sacrificing to lasciviousness the parental affection...either destroy the embryo in the womb, or cast if off when born. Nature in every thing demands respect, and those who violate her laws seldom violate them with impunity."
“I don’t think the culture has changed to the extent that American people or the Congress would totally ban abortions.”
-George W. Bush
“No. I don’t think it should be overtuned.”
-Laura Bush on NBC’s Today show describing Roe v. Wade.
George W. Bush is not Pro-Life
On some cases, Bush had created reasonable measures that are pro-Life, but when the total evidence is put in context, he isn’t pro-life. By his own coments, he never intends to support a total abortion ban during his Presidency. That’s a fact, so don’t expect him doing anything more than the fake so-called partial birth abortion ban.
George W. Bush even in his own stated position on abortion supported s o-called ‘exceptions’ to a ban on partial birth abortion, which is in-utero child killing, violating God’s word in Exodus 20:13 and the 5th Amendment. The only reason Bush passed the so-called partial birth abortion ban because it’s in November 2003, after almost 3 years in office and near the election year of 2004.
Larry Flynt (a disgraceful pornographer) isn’t my cup of tea, but an October 20th interview, Flynt said he had affidavits from 5 women who were connected with George W. Bush’s illegal abortion at Houston in 1970. (which was before Roe v. Wade when Bush worked on his father’s campaign)
This is hypocrisy by Bush since he arranged an abortion himself although he lyingly props himself up as being pro-life. George W. Bush signed legislation appropriating $100 million to the contraceptives for aborticfacients for unmarried adolescents to fornicate.
This same legislation contains over $50 million (es timated) per year in the Title X birth control program given to Planned Parenthood which kills at least 200,000 babies per year (Planned Parenthood admitted to killed 700,000 in 2001 alone).
He’s even given $59 million of our tax dollars to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) late last year. The $15 billion AIDS plan was passed in part funding the killing of innocent children (abortion) overseas. If Bush was really Pro-Life, he would at least spoke openly to wish to see Roe v. Wade be extinct and abortions eliminated, but he hasn’t.
This isn’t odd to me, because George W. Bush is a Satanist and the Illuminati funded abortions for decades through the Rockefellers and Van Duyn. George W. Bush’s Pro-Life front is just conveyed to deceive Christians to follow his tune despite his immoral policies. Christian Pro-Lifers and Constitutionalists just cannot vote for George W. Bush in 2004. That’s all allies.
RU-486
This pill have been dubbed the abortion pill. William Jefferson Clinton first issued it unto Americans on September 28, 2000. This allowed the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) to approve RU-486 for marketing and prescripton in the United States. This monostrity was invented by Dr. Etienre-Emile Baulieu in France. It’s legal in France by 1988 and used in other European countries plus Communist China as well.
China is no surprise since its appalling human rights and religious rights’ abuses with one child polices by forced abortion, contraception, sterilization, infanticide, and death camps by torture. Many abortionists like Eleanor Smeal, Gloria Feldt, and Al Gore all supported Ru-486 as safe and great for women.
Obviously, they are sadly mistaken. The abortion pill is a synthetic steroid that starves the baby to d eath by restricting progesterone (a natural hormone vital to the early stages of pregnancy) to the unborn child by detaching the baby from the wall of the mother’s womb. The baby dies a short time later as a result of resources ending.
There is absolutely a Nazi connection with RU-486. During WWII, Hoescht AG was IG Farben, the Nazi chemical giant known for its production of cynanide gas and Zyklon-B to kill million of people in Hitler’s regime at concentration camps. (i.e. Auschwitz, etc.) IG Farben also performed unethical medical experiments undertaken by Mengele and other S.S. doctors.
IG Farben may change its stripes to Hoescht AG, but a Nazi is still a Nazi if it continues in the Nazi practice of Abortion. Hoescht AG now owns Roussel Uclaf (a company who was once a subsidiary to IG Farben). The negative effects of RU-486 are just blatantly evil.
In U.S. trials, 79-96% of women taking RU-486/PG developed prolonged pain requiring a pin killer, 24-61% experienced nausea. Other side effect are diarrhea, vomiting, infection, skin conditions, breast conditions, very heavy vaginal bleeding, etc. Bleeding can last up to 40 days and dilatoration and curterage is required in many cases.
An ABC News poll at September 6th-10th, 2000 have 45% to 47% opposing RU-486 being legal. Legalized murder couldn’t be more accessible than this destructive pill.
The Early Church on Abortion
The Bible in the Old Testament and the New Testament are exclusively Pro-Life. This is my exegesis of it. The Holy Bible has God as the Author of Life and that life is in the blood. (Genesis 2:7, Deuteronomy 30:20, Acts 17:25, 28) Only God is entitled to end one's life and to deliberately destroy human life without cause is sin and is punishable by death (Exodus 20:13, Psalm 31:15, Genesis 9:6, Acts 25:11, Matthew 26:52, Romans 1:32, Revelation 13:10, etc.)
Also, the scriptures fully convey the personhood of the unborn. The Bible refers to the unborn as children not "blobs of tissue" or "it" plus the unborn is a separate being apart from the mother. (Luke 1:36, Matthew 1:18, 23, Genesis 25:21-24, etc.)
The Scriptures fully display at Exodus 21:22-25 that if a fight breaks out and a pregnant woman miscarriages with a child coming out, but the child and mother lives, a fine is given for punishment for the man. If anyone is harmed leading to death, whether the child or the mother, then it's life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth proving that the unborn child is a person.
There is no need to abort since God has a plan for all life established at conception. (Pslam 139:13-16, Isaiah 1:5, Jeremiah 1:5, Galatians 1:15) From the Bible, God knew the plan of Jeremiah before being formed in the belly of the womb. God hates the shedding of innocent blood. (Exodus 23:7, Proverbs 6:16-19, Isaiah 5:20-21) To abort a baby is to kill an innocent.
The baby is inside of the womb with a different blood than the mother's, seperate brainwaves, and different human DNA making it seperate and independent from the mother being a person.
God the Son was in Mary's womb. Mary was poor and lived in harsh circumstances so does Mary des erves an abortion possessing the right to choose? Is Jesus inside of Mary's womb, part of Mary's body?
Are the prophets of the OT deserve abortion if their mothers are poor, born out of wedlock, sick mothers, etc. No. Abortion is borderline blasphemy since innocent life is degraded and it disrespects Christ's birth with a poor family being God in the flesh.
Abortion is just directly an interference to the potential of all human life leading to a great life following God. There is a possibilty that the aborted child could be the world's next great leader, but we may never know or witness since that life is gone.
There is no Biblical justification for abortion whatsoever. Without further ado, here’s the opinion of the Early Church on Abortion plus Martin Luther and John Calvin opposed abortion as well.
1). 150 AD Didache "The second commandment of the teaching: You shall not murder. You shall not commit adultery. You shall not seduce boys. You shall not commit fornication. You shall not steal. You shall not practice magic. You shall not use potions. You shall not procure [an] abortion, nor destroy a newborn child" (Didache 2:1)
2). 170 AD Mark Felix "There are some women among you who by drinking special potions extinguish the life of the future human in their very bowels, thus committing murder before they even give birth." (Mark Felix, Christian Lawyer, Octavius chap. 30)
3). 177 AD Athenagoras "What man of sound mind, therefo re, will affirm, while such is our character, that we are murderers? . . . [W]hen we say that those women who use drugs to bring on abortion commit murder, and will have to give an account to God for the abortion, on what principle should we commit murder?
For it does not belong to the same person to regard the very fetus in the womb as a created being, and therefore an object of God's care, and when it has passed into life, to kill it; and not to expose an infant, because those who expose them are chargeable with child-murder, and on the other hand, when it has been reared to destroy it" (A Plea for the Christians 35, Embassy chap. 5).
177 AD Athenagoras, "What reason would we have to commit murder when we say that women who induce abortions are murderers, and will have to give account of it to God? For the same person would not regard the fetus in the womb as a living thing and therefore an object of God's care, and at the same time slay it, on ce it had come to life." (Athenagoras Plea, ch.35)
4). 210 AD Tertullian "In our case, a murder being once for all forbidden, we may not destroy even the fetus in the womb, while as yet the human being derives blood from the other parts of the body for its sustenance. To hinder a birth is merely a speedier man-killing; nor does it matter whether you take away a life that is born, or destroy one that is coming to birth. That is a man which is going to be one; you have the fruit already in its seed" (Apology 9:8).
210 AD Tertullian "Now we allow that life begins with conception because we contend that the soul also begins from conception; life taking its commencement at the same moment and place that the soul does" (Apology 27).
210 AD Tertullian "The law of Moses, indeed, punishes with due penalties the man who shall cause abortion [Ex. 21:22]
5). 226 AD Minucius Felix "There are s ome [pagan] women who, by drinking medical preparations, extinguish the source of the future man in their very bowels and thus commit a parricide before they bring forth. And these things assuredly come down from the teaching of your [false] gods. . . . To us [Christians] it is not lawful either to see or hear of homicide" (Octavius 30).
6). 228 AD Hippolytus "Women who were reputed to be believers began to take drugs to render themselves sterile, and to bind themselves tightly so as to expel what was being conceived, since they would not, on account of relatives and excess wealth, want to have a child by a slave or by any insignificant person. See, then, into what great impiety that lawless one has proceeded, by teaching adultery and murder at the same time!" (Refutation of All Heresies).
Partial birth Abortion
This injustice must no go unexposed. Partial birth abortion is a measure so obviously barbaric that even many pro-choice advocates oppose it. An outline of the whole sequences entails this:
-The womb is guided by an ultrasound, then the abortionist murderer get the baby's legs with forceps.
-The baby's legs are pulled out into the birth canal, and then the baby's entire body is delivered except the head.
-The abortionist jammed the baby's skull with scissors, opens a hole, and sucks the baby's brain out with a suction catheter.
-The skull collapses soon later and the dead baby are then removed for possible body part sells, Illuminati Satanic cannibalistic sacrifice rituals, etc.
Most of the babies died by 20 weeks (4 1/2 months after conception) and even as late as the 2nd or 3rd Trimester to full term (4 weeks). This is very sick!!!!! Manly healthy babies are affected not doomed babies said by pro-abortion groups.
It's never safe as even admitted by prominent doctors. Dr. Warren Hern, author f the late term abortion medical text said, "I would dispute any statement that this is the safest procedure to use. The procedure can cause amniotic fluid embolism or placental abruption." (AMA News, November 10, 1995, p.3)
Dr. Pamela Smith, Director of Medical Education, Department of Ob-Gyn at Mt. Sinai Hospital in Chicago has stated "There are absolutely no obstetrical situations encountered in this country which require partial abortion to preserve the life or the health of the mother." Dr. Pamela Smith also mentioned 2 other risks of partial birth abortion including:
1). Cervical incompetence in subsequent pregnancies caused by three days of forceful dilation of the cervix.
2). Uterine rupture caused by rotating the fetus in the womb.
Joseph DeCook, founder of PHACT (Physicians Ad Hoc Coalition for Truth) and an Ob/Gyn mentioned that partial birth abortion is an unsafe act carried out by maverick doctors which could lead to sterility by infection and tearing or puncturing the uterus (which can cause the mother to bleed to death in 10 minutes).
This immoral action isn't necessary to proceed since according to a 1999 report by the Federal Center for Disease Control, less than 2% of abortions are done after the 5th month. A 2000 report by the Guttmacher Institute stated that less than 20% of 1% of all abortions are partial-birth abortions.
Now the partial birth abortion bill was passed overwhelmingly of a majority of the House and Senate supporting it. Now Section 1351 of the law doesn't ban partial birth abortion to save the life of the mother, illness, physical injury life-threatening condition, etc. Words like "illness" or "physical injury" are so ambiguous that an abortion can still be performed under limited circumstances.
Despite the "banning" of infanticide, pro-death advocates still are against it and a federal court struck down this law. This is a half-empty law though since it gives too much leave way to perform partial birth abortions with narrow exceptions of ill ness and physical injury. George W. Bush hasn't strongly taken on that federal court to support the passed law.
One child is not saved as a result of this law so far. Many evangelical Christian leaders are praising the law like Carrie Earll, Sandy Rios, Rand Land, Jerry Falwell (Southern Baptist), Dr. James Dobson, Pat Robertson, and Phillis Schafly.
Evangelicals are great God-fearing people, but their leadership is controlled by the globalist ecumenicals and their leadership are also manipulated by "Rev." Sun Moon (a Korean Satanist) using this to promote the N.W.O.
The vast majority of Americans oppose partial birth abortion. A July 24, 2003 ABC News poll outlined that 62% of Americans support a partial birth abortion ban, but 61% say it should be legal to save the life of the mother.
Just only 20 % of Americans believe it should be legal in all circumstances. T he pro-choice advocates just have no case for partial just like for all abortions regardless of their lies, exaggerations, emotionalism, and spin. We're on the winning side. We're on God's side.
Abortion and Breast Cancer
These are just the facts from: www.abortiontv.com/Breast...ortion.htm
:
Women have the right to know that there are now 27 out of 34 worldwide studies (from among those 13 out of 14 were American studies) which show a link between induced abortion and breast cancer, seventeen of which are statistically significant, and most of which have been done by abortion supporters.
The first study was published in an English publication in 1957 and focused on Japanese women. It sh owed a 2.6 or 160% increased risk of breast cancer among women who had had an induced abortion. [Segi et al. (1957) GANN 48 (Suppl.):1-63]
Abortion is an "elective surgical procedure and a woman’s exposure to the hormones of early pregnancy -- if it is interrupted -- is so great, that just one interrupted pregnancy is enough to make a significant difference in her risk" (Professor Joel Brind, President, Breast Cancer Prevention Institute, Endeavour Forum Public Meeting, August 24, 1999, Malvern, Victoria, Australia).
The American Cancer Society has stated in its fact sheet that abortion "may be associated with increased breast cancer risk" {American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts & Figures --1996, at 12 (1996)}. (An employee of the American Cancer Society with the Office of Corporation Counsel has asked us to remove the Society's 1996 statement from our web site. We have contacted the Society and asked them to inform us of the legal basis for th eir request, if any.)
Dr. Janet Daling, an abortion supporter, and her colleagues at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center were commissioned by the National Cancer Institute to do a study on the abortion-breast cancer link. The study found that, "among women who had been pregnant at least once, the risk of breast cancer in those who had experienced an induced abortion was 50% higher than among other women."
It was also reported that women under the age of 18 or over the age of 29 who obtained induced abortions had more than a twofold increase in risk. Women with a family history of breast cancer who procured an abortion were reported to have statistically significant risk increases of 80 percent. Teenagers under age 18 with a family history breast cancer who procured abortions had an incalculably high risk increase.
Because American women already face a lifetime risk of developing breast cancer of about 12 percent, the increase d risk from a single induced abortion is comparable to the risk of lung cancer from long-term heavy smoking. However, not all women who have had abortions will get breast cancer, and not all women who have breast cancer have had abortions.
There is one more way in which abortion increases the risk of breast cancer. Medical experts universally agree that it is healthier for a married woman not to postpone her first full-term pregnancy.
One Harvard study reported that each year that a woman postpones her first full-term pregnancy increases her breast cancer risk by 3.5%. [Dr. Brian MacMahon, Dr. Dimitrios Trichopoulos, et al., “Age at any Birth and Breast Cancer Risk,” International Journal of Cancer, 1983;31:701704].
An abortion causes a woman to forego the benefit of increased protection from breast cancer resulting from an earlier first full-term pregnancy.
World Health Organization scientists in 1970 confirmed this sayin g that, "It is estimated that women having their first child when aged under 18 years have only about one-third the breast cancer risk of those whose first birth is delayed until the age of 35 years or more." (MacMahon B, et al. Bull Wld Health Org, 1970; 43-209-21).
By TruthSeeker24
SOLA SCRIPTURA
SOLA FIDE
SOLA GRATIA
SOLA GLORIA DEO
SOLA CHRISTO
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
SEMPER LIBER
February 26, 2004
12:42 pm. EST
YOU CAN PRINT AND SHOW THIS TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE WAKING PEOPLE UP ABOUT ABORTION AND TO CHURCHES AS WELL
GOOD LUCK ALLIES.
