Our Civil Liberties

Gulag Amerika and Our Civil Liberties

No other words can describe the civil liberties situation in America as nothing but deplorable. While most Americans are blinded to our diminished liberty, the big, central government operators abide to enact policies detrimental to our fundamental God-given rights. It just seems that the world will sink even lower eliminating the need for rationality.

Screening visitors inside airports have turned a perverted turn. The November 29, 2004 edition of the U.S. News and World Report had shown that now the TSA (Transportation Security Administration) allowed screeners to pat down male and female’s private areas.

 

Disgusting is this procedure since you’re violating people’s most secret privacy plus it strips human dignity. It started in late September 2004 and dozens of women complained about this. A lot of female breasts were searched and this offended women. According to Internet Free Press at 7:50 pm., 2 Armored Personnel Carriers (APC) showed up in an anti-war protest in front of a federal building at Westwood, LA. The tank moved despite people trying to block it. What a classic example of an illegal use of the military to interfere with the citizenry. WBOCTV’s website exposed that some of the police in Miami-Dade County, Florida used a stun gun on a 6-year old boy at a Miami Kelsey, Pharr Elementary School.

The boy was cutting himself and the officers zapped him with 50,000 volts of the stun gun to the boy. The police never rushed the kid to get the glass away, but stunned him which could kill the kid. This is pure terrorism and torture all rolled into one utilizing mass conditioning to desensitize people for folly. There are even more illustrations of the United States emulating totalitarian or fascist tactics.

January is when the inauguration of the Emperor George W. Bush and the since is filled of the pregnancy of pomp (an imperial presence and the monitoring of freedom lover) plus the aura of his illegitimacy [Bush never won the 1st election and the 2nd one is a continuation of his selection into the office of Presidency]. In the whole specatle, there were anti-aircraft missiles near the Capitol missiles and the military in the thousands around the scene like a Hitler rally. The whole city of Washington D.C. looked more of a police state than it did around the time of 9/11. One newspaper describe the area perfectly:

“To celebrate President Bush's inauguration Thursday, the nation's capital has turned itself into an armed camp. Outside of Baghdad's Green Zone, downtown Washington will be the most heavily fortified city in the world. For Inauguration Day festivities, security officials are closing off 100 square blocks to all traffic, and in another 100 square blocks traffic will be restricted to those who live there.

This is in a city where a carelessly placed traffic cone can cause instant gridlock. The Department of Homeland Security admits that there is no specific threat to the inauguration. Indeed, the "chatter" had been subdued of late, but why take chances? Private planes will be barred from a 3,000-square-mile area around the capital, and the no-fly zone will be enforced by an armada of fighter jets, Customs planes and helicopters. It's not only airspace. Armed Coast Guard patrols will enforce a no-boat zone on the Potomac River.

The president's friends and other supporters will be welcomed to the capital by 6,000 law-enforcement agents and 7,000 troops. Among them, adding a Fallujah-kind of feel to the fun, will be combat troops from the 3rd Infantry Division with M-4 assault rifles and night-vision goggles. There will be a Marine Corps chemical and biological rapid-reaction force and also -- and surely this will be of some comfort -- an engineering unit specializing in rescuing people from collapsed buildings. Those with tickets for the swearing-in and the parade will get to relive the airport experience that brought them here. There will be 22 security checkpoints around the perimeter. The list of no-nos includes backpacks, thermoses, aerosol sprays, glass bottles, coolers, bags larger than 8 by 6 by 4 inches, strollers and -- better hope it doesn't rain -- umbrellas. You won't have to remove your shoes -- not yet, at least. To the anguish of Christian groups, the authorities have also banned crosses.” (From www.infowars.com/articles...g_bush.htm "D.C. has stifling security blanket" by Cincinnati Post | January 18, 2005)

Signs and posters aren’t allowed at the Inauguration. Denials of liberties, extremist actions, and the on-going torture enduring aren’t representative of humanity. These instances harold the burning of the Bill of Rights and Constitution. Everyone will have to know their rights and be forever vigilant [and alert] to expose and quarrel against tyranny. Honorable laws originate not from the fallible, imperfect might of man, but from the supreme, just, and Almighty hand of God.

 

Michelle Malkin

Michelle Malkin is a Filipino Neo Con who is trying to justify Japanese Americans filled inside concentration camps during World War II in her recent book “In Defense of Internment.” She’s a nationally known journalist and a FOX News contributor who resides in Maryland. Although her earlier book called “Invasion” indeed rightfully outlined the immigration problems that continue to sustain itself inside America.

Michelle is totally wrong on civil liberties and the racial profiling of individuals. Her simple arguments to promote the internment of Japanese human beings are that there was a Japanese threat on the West Coast [proven by top secret “MAGIC messages”], and other ethnic groups were inside them like Europeans. Also, Michelle Malkin further contends that many were allowed to leave and hundreds voluntarily moved into internment camps. Racial profiling as a necessity to be advanced is her motto.

Michelle makes mention that the $16.5 billion federal bipartisan federal reparations law for Japanese internees and evacuees was a disaster. My rebuttals to these immoral comments by Malkin are easy and sweeping. Even if there were a Japanese espionage threat; the procedure to respond ought to be investigations of those accused with due process.

There is absolutely no need for the basic allowance of 112,000 people into select concentration camps being highly an overreaction. Internment camps, regardless if other ethnic groups were allowed in (FDR indeed sent German, Italians, Hungarians, Romanians, and Bulgarians into concentration camps), are still wrong. It’s wrong because those Japanese people are innocent and were not convicted of guilt under a court of law. After the war, Japanese and German Americans lost their jobs, had to sell their property, and had to rebuild their lives all over again.

 

Surprisingly, Michelle loves the Democratic, FDR Gestapo policies. What Malkin failed to point out is that FDR knew of the Pearl Harbor attack and did nothing to avert it. (She should read Mark Everson Willer’s Pearl Harbor: The Mother of All Conspiracies which proves it 100%) The criminal FDR devised the Office of Censorship, conscription of 10 million men, food rationizing, and allowed civilian bombings. What a pity that a woman so intelligent could be so hoodwinked.

Racial profiling is a concept that I’ve always opposed since you judge a criminal by just cause and by the content of someone’s character [and actions] not by the color of one’s skin or race. The ante-9/11 world would give us more inspiration to boost our civil liberties and rights. To degrade them is futile for real, evil terrorism can be done by people not of Arab descent also. In actuality, this terrorism war is fake and the Bush government is the real terrorists.

 

The Elite created al-Qaeda in the 1980’s and funded Saddam Hussein since 1959. To protect ourselves by watching our borders is fine, but anti-civil liberty measures decrease freedoms instead of making us safe. The justification for that is suppressing right can lead the government to have a higher risk to bring fascism unto the people.

Remember that a police state and terror go hand and hand. The financial money used is debatable, but to not send reparations to the Japanese victims is out of the question. Reparations for Japanese people who suffered WWII internment camps is totally justified for compensation for bad treatment toward oppressed people are moral, biblical, and just.

J. Edgar Hoover and Earl Warren just were one of the many architects of the internment camp system for Japanese Americans. This was a pretext for the government in this new millennium to develop FEMA camps to house dissenters in this fake war on terrorism. I love you Michelle Malkin as a human being, but you need to open your eyes and heart to cherish authentic liberty.

 

The DNC/RNC 2004 Presidential Conventions

The 1st Amendment was obviously violated in the Democratic National Convention at Boston. In Pastor John Meyer’s research, it occurred at the 2nd full moon of the month of July known as the blue moon. Blue stands for divination or seeing into the future during the witches’ high sabat of Lughnsaid (or the harvesting of souls).

Barricades, helicopters, and a so-called Free Speech Zone with barred wire fences were common place. There was a military presence with police possessing AK-47s. The whole occurrence was putrid. This was nothing compared to the Republican National Convention inside New York City where the Bush team returned to the scene of the crime from August-September 2004.

The New York City Convention had one of the nation’s worst civil liberty curtailing events ever in the 21st century. A center detaining “disruptors” existed which looked like a miniature concentration camp.

 

The NYPD violated the 1878 law of Posse Comitatus [that separate the police from the military and bans the military from being involved in civilian functions] when they had military-style machine gun weapons and had many police who refused to identify themselves to the public. 41,000 police officers were at the Convention.

According to Alex Jones, the NYPD were instructed to harass independent media and to coddle the mainstream media. Police wrongfully shoved Alex Jones. New technologies were used to intimidate the protestors of Bush’s Fourth Reich like sonic weapons and satellites. Across the vicinity, there were helicopters and one Fuji blimp watching the protestors. The protests were huge which covered 10 blocks long and filled up to 6 streets simultaneously. I saw much of it personally for hours on C-Span and it was a beautiful sight for the most part to behold.

Further Torture in Iraq and Camp X-Ray

Torture is easily condemned by stripping human dignity and a non-threatening person with no provocation ought not to be assaulted. It is no deterrence to prevent crime for doing torture since anyone can say anything (true or false) to escape the punishment and torture is definitely fits that definition. New developments are arising up in Abu Ghraib and Camp X-Ray. First, its time to review what the Abu Ghraib atrocity was all about. An investigation by Major General Antonio M. Taguba (ordered by Lt. General Ricardo Sanchez, commander of Joint Task Force-7) recorded at a MSNBC news site proved that torture existed by photos, confessions by suspects, written statements by detainees, and witnesses in Abu Ghraib. The torture included:

-a male MP guard having sex with a female detainee.
-a dog in one case biting and severly injuring a detainee.
-punching, slapping, and kicking detainees plus jumping on their naked feet.
-arranging naked male detainees to be piled up and jumping upon them and other sick, bizarre actions.

Brigadier General Janis Karpinski of the U.S. Reserve claimed that reservists have urged on torturing the Iraqi prisoners by the CIA, Army Intelligence, CID (Criminal Investigation Division) personnel, as well as mercenaries employed by PMC (Private Military Companies).

They include Titan Corporation and CACI International Inc. whose board members include Richard Armitage, Deputy U.S. Secretary of State. Karpinski was the scapegoat of the scandal and this torture has extensions stretching all the way to the White House. Julian Colman, a writer in Washington for the London telegraph, at June 13, 2004 described new evidence detailing the abuse in Abu Ghraib as authorized at the top of the Bush administration. They have 4 Red Cross documents implicating senior Pentagon civilians in Abu Ghraib.

Memos also reveal that George W. Bush was advised by Alberto Gonzales that the Geneva Conventions on torture don’t apply to “unlawful combatants” capturing during the war on terror. Other documents reveal that General Ricardo Sanchez, the senior U.S. officer in Iraq, approved of dogs, temperature, extreme, reversed sleep patterns, and sensory deprivation for prisoners in Abu Ghraib.

At April 2004 (before the Abu Ghraib scandal came unto the public scene), Marines in Mahrandyiya, shocked at a detainee with an electronic transformer (forcing him to dance as the electricity hit him, according to a witness, are document for states). 2 Marines pledged guilty in the case. At the PTI at December 15, 2004, the Navy conducted a probe on new cases of prisoner abuse and punished many Marines. According to documents released by the Navy following a court order, one incident had a detainee’s hand burned by igniting alcohol based cleaner.

(In an August 2003 investigation by the NCIS [Naval Criminal Intelligence Services]) and some were punished. The ACLU secured the document. Torture is still occurring in Guamtanamo Bay, Cuba. Late December 2004 is the time when the New York Times revealed that food was withheld from the detainees and forced to defecate on them. A FBI agent admitted to it in documents. The ACLU has even more documents proving continued torture at Camp X-Ray. Torture is so proven that even the ACLU again is bringing a lawsuit against Donald Rumsfeld for involvement in the circumstances that led to the torture in Iraq and Guamtanamo Bay, Cuba.



By Timothy
March 3, 2005.

My Own words on Abortion

Abortion


Both Adolf Hitler and Margaret Sanger agreed on Eugenics:

"The demand that defective people be prevented from propagating equally defective offspring. . . represents the most humane act of mankind." (By Adolf Hitler from his Mein Kampf, vol. 1, ch. 10 and also from Hitler and Eugenics and the Fuhrer Myth)

". . .we prefer the policy of immediate sterilizarion, of making sure that parenthood is ' absolutely prohibed ' to the feeble-minded." The Pivot of Civilization, p102 by Margaret Sanger-Founder of Planned Parenthood)

*These are other evidences that make manifest that fact that Margaret Sanger’s eugenics beliefs intertwined her with Nazis who were influenced by her. Planned Parenthood shared the same agenda of Adolph Hitler regardless of the numerous lying denials on Planned Parenthood’s website or brainwashing prop aganda tools. Both evil people seek to destroy any human being [created in the image of Almighty God] they deem “inferior.”

Moral Logic Against Abortion:
There is no moral, scientific, religious, etc. justification for abortion. The simple moral case against the murder of abortion is that innocent life whether in or out a womb is another innocent human being who don't deserve to die since they warranted nothing for death being innocent. Man is a moral, rational creature and have choice by God but has not the right to execute unlimited choice for that will break several civil and moral principles and laws. Man's choice for abortion is therefore invalid. Death of innocent life under any circumstances or reasons is morally wrong and repugnant to God. The early church and the Holy Bible uniformly condemned all forms of abortion. ABORTION IS STRIAGHT MURDER PLAIN AND SIMPLE.

Next are a few docume nts that prove the pro-Life side to be most logical and true by historical precedents and actions of Nazi pro-death proponents.

More on Margaret Sanger and Refuting Planned Parenthood’s Support for her:

According to Steven W. Mosher’s “The Repacking of Margaret Sanger from the Wall Street Journal at May , 1997: after her obscenity charges dropped, she created the Birth Control League and printed “The Birth Control Review” [a magazine which regularly featured racists and eugencists.] Contributor Lothrop Stoddard, who also seved on Sanger’s board of directors, wrote “The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy” where he claimed that “we must resolutely oppose both Asiatic prmeation of white areas and Asiatic inundation of those non-white, but equally non-Asiatic regions inhabited by the really inferior races.”

Sanger’s magazine also made policy proposals, such as the creation of “moro n communities”, the forced production of children by the “fit”, and the compulsory sterilization and even elimination of the “unfit.” Therefore, many eugenic racists were part of Planned Parenthood, and Sanger didn’t rebuke them or fire them. That alone refutes the lies of abortion and Planned Parenthood.

Margaret Sanger also was against Organized Charity:
“"Even if we accept organized charity at its own valuation, and grant it does the best it can, it is exposed to a more profound criticism. It reveals a fundamental and irremedial defect. Its very success, its very efficiency, its very necessity to the social order are the most unanswerable indictment. Organized charity is the symptom of a malignant social disease. Those vast, complex, interrelated organizations aiming to control and to diminish the spread of misery and destitution and all the menacing evils that spring out of this sinisterly fertile soil, are the surest sign that ou r civilization has bred, is breeding, and is perpetuating constantly increasing numbers of defective, delinquents, and dependents. My criticism, therefore, is not directed at the failure of philanthropy, but rather at its success. These dangers are inherent in the very idea of humanitarianism and altruism, dangers which have toda produced their full harvest of human waste." [The Pivot of Civilization by Margaret Sanger, pg. 108 from web.archive.org/web/20020...thood.html One again the government is playing hardball in banning internet sites that show the truth.]

Explicit Racist Remarks by Margaret Sanger:
“The masses of Negroes…particularly in the South, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with the result that in the increase among Negroes, even more then among whites, is from that portion of the populaton least intelligent and fit…”(Killer Angel, George Grant, Reformer Press; p. 73)

“…a religious appeal. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population," she said, "if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." (Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon)

Sir William Blackstone on Abortion in the 1700’s according to English Common Law:


“Life is the immediate gift of God, a right inherent by nature in every individual…It begins, in the contemptation of law, as soon as an infant is ableto stir in the mother’s womb.” (W. Blackstone: Commentaries on the Laws of England, Chicago: University Press, 1979 rep. 1 pp. 125f. See too Justice Tom C. Clark: The Law As It Governs Decisions Today in [Spitzer & Saylor: op cit., p. 359).

A Letter Between Dr. Charles F. Digh, one of Sanger’s board members and his fellow eugenicist, Adolf Hitler:

“August 1, 1933

Chancellor Adolf Hitler
Berlin, Germany


Honorable Chancellor,

I enclose a clipping from the Minneapolis Journal of Minnesota Journal, United States of America, relating to and praising your plan to stamp out mental inferirority among the German people. I trust you will accept my sincere wish that your efforts along that line will be a great success and will advance the eugenic movement in other nations as well as in Germany.

Sincerely,
C.F. Dight
President of Minnesota Eugenics Society.”

Now here’s Ex amples of Planned Parenthood’s folly [This is mainly from lifesite.net/interim/2003...thood.html ]:
1). In December 2001, the Colorado state health department announced that Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains wasn't going to get any more money from the state because an audit revealed that it was subsidizing the rent of a separate Planned Parenthood arm that performs abortions. In addition, the health department notified PP that it might not have been complying with federal regulations on fees it charged for contraceptives for low-income women, because PP charged more than other agencies.

2). In October 1997, the director of Planned Parenthood in Niagara County, N.Y. was fined $1,000 by the state for committing two unasked-for abortions and a mistaken sterilization. Dr. Rafael G. Cunanan Jr. was also placed o n probation for four years. It was found that Cunanan failed to have pregnancy tests done on women before committing dilation and curettages, and suction and curettages. He had also, without consent, done a tubal sterilization on a young woman in 1984, and then paid her to keep silent.

3). In 1999, Stop Planned Parenthood International discovered that the Planned Parenthood Federation of America - despite claiming tax-exempt, non-profit status - makes huge profits every year. STOPP said that between 1988 and 1999, the birth control behemoth raked in total profits of $229.8 million - including $42.3 million in one year alone. During that same period of time, the PPFA received $1.6 billion in public monies.

4). Also in November [of 2002], Planned Parenthood of North-Central Ohio was blasted for its proposal to have two teens from each of four high schools in Morrow County be paid $100 to act as outreach workers, and get an additional $5 bonus for ev ery patient they recruited for a Planned Parenthood clinic in Cardington, Oh. STOPP noted that the clear intent of the scheme was to get kids hooked on sex and contraception, without parental involvement.


5). Also in May [of 2002], worldnetdaily.com reported on a California father who accessed Planned Parenthood's website for teens. "It's beyond disgusting," he said. "It has a letter written to kids that begins with, 'Despite what your teachers and parents say ...' and it was something along the lines of: 'You don't really need math or French or literature after high school. What you need to learn is SEX' - in capital letters."

6). STOPP=Stop Planned Parenthood International. Kansas pathologist Miles Jones was paid by a local Planned Parenthood abortion clinic to dispose of aborted baby parts, He allegedly brought in additional profits by running a company that sold the parts to researchers. He stated to undercover reporters that he ma de $50,000 a week. (Christ Wallace "Parts for Sale; People Make Thousands of Dollars Off the Sale of Fetal Body Parts ABC News 20/20 Mar.8 2000; Investigation into marketing of fetal Tissue Ends" The Associated press Sept.3, 2001) from www.letusreason.org/Curren12.htm
Planned Parenthood is not the boycott group the controlled media has created them to be at all. www.respectlife.org/educatio/pp.htm

Where Does Life Begin?


It is my opinion that life begins at conception. Even numerous mainstream scientists adhere to that valued truth. At conception, a zygote forms and within weeks, most of the primary infrastructures of man are already present inside of the unborn. Read these sources to be aware of that truth and the valued life of the unborn:



“Scientifically there is absolutely no question whatsoever that the immediate product of fertilization is a newly existing human being. A human zygote is a human being. It is not a “potential” or a “possible” human being. It is an actual human being-with the potential to grow bigger and develop its capacities.” (Dr. Diane Irving, “When does Life Begin? Scientific Myths and Scientific Facts”, Intentional Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 1999, p. 6). Want for facts. Here’s more to you gratefully.


1). In 1981 (April 23-24) a Senate Judiciary Subco mmittee held hearings
on the very question before us here: When does human life begin?
Appearing to speak on behalf of the scientific community was a group
of internationally-known geneticists and biologists who had the same
story to tell, namely, that human life begins at conception - and
they told their story with a profound absence of opposing testimony.
Dr. Micheline M. Mathews-Roth, Harvard medical School, gave
confirming testimony, supported by references from over 20 embryology
and other medical textbooks that human life began at conception.


2). Many professional doctors believe that life begins at conception and other anti-abortion conceptions like these:


i). Dr. Hymie Gordon, Chairman, Department of Genetics at the Mayo Clinic
added: "By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is
present from the moment of conception."


ii). Dr. McCarthy de Mere, medical doc tor and law professor, University
of Tennessee, testified: "The exact moment of the beginning of
personhood and of the human body is at the moment of conception."


iii). Dr. Alfred Bongiovanni, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine,
concluded, "I am no more prepared to say that these early stages
represent an incomplete human being than I would be to say that the
child prior to the dramatic effects of puberty ... is not a human being.”



iv). “I do not believe there is any question when biological human life begins. It is at conception… To say that it begins at any other time is biological nonsense.” (Andre Helleger, M.D. GeorgeTown University Hospital)



v). “Immunological studies have demonstrated beyond cavil that when a pregnancy implants itself into the wall of the uterus at the eighth day following conception the defense mechanisms of the body, princip ally the white blood cells, sense that this creature now settling down ... is an intruder, an alien, and must be expelled. Therefore an intense immunological attack is mounted on the pregnancy . . . and through an ingenious and extraordinarily efficient defense system the unborn child succeeds in repelling the attack ... Even in the most minute microscopic scale the body has trained itself, or somehow in some inchoate way, knows how to recognize self from nonself.”
(Bernard Nathanson, The Abortion Papers: Inside the Abortion Mentality, p.150. 1983)


Dr. Bernard Nathanson was once pro-abortion, but became pro-life admitting that he and members of the pro-abortion movement lied about facts concerning abortion. He was also is a co-founder of the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws.



The Original Hippocratic Oath Condemned Abortion


Even though the Bible forbids oath-taking, it’ s truly interesting to note that the original Hippocratic oath condemned this [abomination of abortion] and were deleted from the oath in the 1960’s by the University of Pittsburgh and the University of Toronto School of Medicine:



“I will give no deadly medicine to anyone if asked, nor suggest any such counsel; furthermore, I will not give to a woman an instrument to produce abortion.” (ancient Hippocratic Oath).



“I will maintain the utmost respect for human life from the time of conception.” (Hippocratic Oath, revised September, 1948, Declaration of Geneva).



Problems for Women after Abortion:



“After ones experience of Abortion many can be guilt ridden, have anxiety, depression, a sense of loss have hostility, entertain suicide and psychosis can set in. Any women can suffer from not one but a combination of these problems. This trauma is recognized by the American Psychiatric As sociation as a psychological stress disorder and is listed in their Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.” (DSM III-R: 309.89, Washington, D.D. American Psychiatric Press, p. 250, 1987).
More Truthful/Facist/Racist/Gestapo Quotes Involving Abortion:

1). "The 54% of black children born to unwed mothers are not productive
members of society. Teenagers never make good mothers....single mothers have
bad children." (--Nancy White, representative of NARAL quoted in "The American
Feminist", Summer 1994, p 14) That’s Racist.

2). "From a strict medical viewpoint, every pregnancy should be aborted."
(--Abortionist Lisa Fortier, 1980 National Convention of the National Abortion
Federation. Quoted
in Andrew SCholberg, "The Abortionists and Planned Parenthood: Familiar
Bedfellows" International Review of Family Planning, Winter 1980 p 30 That’s Fascist


3). "There was not one [abortion doctor] who, at some point in the
questioning, did not say, "This is murder." (--Pro-choice author Magda Denes
on her two years of research and interviewing of abortion clinic personnel
for her book "In Neccessity and Sorrow: Life and Death Inside and Abortion
Clinic," quoted by S.J. Powell "Abortion: the Silent Holecaust") That’s the Truth.


4). "Abortion is the taking of a life." (--Pro-abortionist and former
Planned Parenthood president Mary Calderone, American Journal of Public
Health vol 50 no. 71960) That’s the truth.


5). According to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s Federation Declaration of Principles, 1980, p. 12, one of the five general goals of Planned Parenthood is “to combat the world population crisis by helping to bring about a population of stable in optimum environmen t in the United States.” That’s Gestapo


6). “Babies are loud, smelly, and expensive. Unless you want one.” (Planned Parenthood of Minnesota/South Dakota, newspaper ad, Barnsville/Lakeville San Current, October 16, 1996) That’s Gestapo and Fascist as well.

Basic Stastistics:


i). The Gallup poll from February 28, 1991, 82% were not aware that Roe vs. Wade legislation made abortion legal throughout the full nine months of pregnancy.

ii). Abortion killed more people (unborn infant human beings) than all American death in all USA involved wars. The Revolutionary War, Civil War, World War I and II, Korean War, Vietnam War, and the 1st Persian Gulf War involved the death of 1,043,569 people, yet abortions in America killed over 40 million people.

iii). Abortion isn’t safe. According to the National Institute of Health says that the death rate is at 30 per 100,000 and there are risks, infection can be a result of abortion and can be 1 in 4 (from mild all the way through fatal).


iv). According to the 1981 British Journal of Cancer 43:726 says that Breast cancer risk increased 140% following an abortion.



*One of the newer psychological strategies is to turn the abortion controversy into a partisan issue. The populace is mainly manipulated by the Illuminati into perceiving that Republicans as being pro-Life and Democrats as pro-choice. This is bunk. A normal human being will feel guilty about murdering a baby whether they are a Democrat or a Republican. Some Democrats are Pro-Life. Pro-Life Democrats and Republicans should be commented for their work and fight against the abomination of abortion.

More on conception:




Dr. John von Neumann [famous 1940’s scientist who was part of the real time-travel U.S. government experiments which moved the USS Eldridge from Philadephia Navy Yard to Norfolk, Virginia and back again] discussed with Albert Einstein about life and found that:


“Von Neumann and his team spent about ten years working on why human beings had troubles with electromagnetic fields that shifted them through different places and time (aka time travel). They actually found that humans are born with what is known as “time reference” point. At conception, an energy being is attached to a timeline and we all start from that point. To understand this, it is necessary to view the “energy being” or soul as distinct from the physical body of the person concerned. (This blows the Jehovah’s Witness doctrine of man not having a soul and anyone else that believes man is nothing more than a physical being right out of the water. Einstein and Neumann both proved man was much more than a physical being.) Our whole reference as a physical and metaphysical being stems from that time reference which actually resides within the electromagnetic background of our planet. The time reference is the basic orientation point that you have to the universe and the way it operates.” (The Montauk Project: Experiments in time by Preston D. Nichols, pg. 50).



There it is by Einstein and Neumann, one of the greatest of the 20th century minds proving that at the time of conception, we are locked into the universe and that is the way it operates as God has created it. Abortion targets mainly the firstborn.


As you know the firstborn was important in Egypt when Pharaoh didn’t adhere to God’s comm and by killing the firstborn of Jewish people. Then God killed the first-born of the Egyptians with his angel and freed the Hebrew slaves. You can look to Ex. 4:22-23, Ex. 13:2, and Num. 3:15 to visualize the real picture.


The firstborn prefigured Christ, the only begotten Son of God who saved the sins of this world by his blood. Also, the first-born represents the best of the family and contributions to society so the Illuminati want abortion to happen so the firstborn is readily desecrated.
Satanists love abortion.


Many aborted parts go to covens and Illuminati centers where they are drained of blood, sacrificed, and cannibalized. According to Doc Marquis [ex-Satanist/Illuminati member turned born again Christian] the best sacrifice for a Satanist are infants or aborted fetuses. Many companies profit by these actions. It’ s sick and also in the Bible, Canaan, and other pagan religions or civilizations cannibalized infants was the norm. Hitler, Mao Zedong, and Stalin all supported abortion.


In the words of Robert Howard “So in closing I will say this. If you do not speak up against abortion you are guilty of murder. If you are pro-choice you are guilty of murder. If you sit on a bench and prosecute those who speak out against it, then you are guilty of murder. Abortion has a far more sinister agenda then you can image.”

You can READ PRINT AND DISTRIBUTE TO AS MANY OUTLETS AS POSSIBLE.

TODAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BYE AND GOOD DAY.

 

By Timothy

 

The Roman Catholic Church

The Roman Catholic Church

*This is especially for many people proping up the Catholic Church as almost divine like Oil Empire praising the Pope in his condemnation of the Iraq War, etc. Orbiting the Roman Catholic Church are heresies and great suppertisions. The origin of the Catholic Church appears to be when Emperor Constantine created a state church 312 A.D. after his “conversion to Christianity.” By 606 A.D., the modern Papacy as you see it today was fully activated. Very few Christians expose its false doctrines since it’s composed over 1.1 billion individually globally.

People are also scared because of the backlash since Catholicism worldwide is extremely potent in the media, religious affairs intentionally, etc. Sometimes taking the unpopular course is the most courageous stance for to hate the world and go against the grain is a sign of being of God. Usually [it happened to me] when anyone legitimately layout bible verses and other evidence that contradict the precepts of Roman Catholicism, Catholics and pro-Papist Protestants will label you as an anti-Catholic bigot or a basher. The fact of the matter is that I hate the Catholic religion and never Catholics personally. Manifesting Roman Catholicism’s deceit show care and love for deluded Catholics not hatred.

There are numerous Catholics who are trying their best to find a real relationship with God, but God in Revelation is calling them to leave. It’s not necessary to be apart of a church incorporating falsehoods for so long then expecting it to reform. Some Catholic apologists attempt to discredit Bible-believers claiming that before Luther; only the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches existed.

This is flat out false for before the Reformation, Waldensians, Anabaptists, The Celtic Church, Benegarians, the Church of the East, independent groups, and other religious Christian churches existed from the time of the Apostles to 1519 as the remnant. God said he will preserve his church forever. Other Catholic apologists claim that Protestantism is flawed because it split into 25,000 to 30,000 different denominations.

Additionally, they view that Protestants exhibit so much disagreement, that no Protestant is apart of Christ’s church. Is this a just case? No, see there is basic unity among all Protestants and Baptists for we all agree on the Foundational doctrines of Christianity (This is what makes you a Christian like the Incarnation, the Atonement, the Resurrection of Jesus Christ, the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, Salvation by grace through faith alone, the authority of the Scriptures being infallible, etc.) All bible-believers subscribe to this and:

“Some things are negotiable. These include things such as the form of baptism, the kind of worship music, the form of church structure and organization, defining the relationship between free will and predestination, and eschatology (beliefs about what will happen during the End Times). These are important issues. They can affect the quality of a person's Christian life. But they do not determine whether or not a person is a Christian. These are areas in which Christians can agree to disagree. Differences among genuine Protestants occur in the second area, the negotiable items. They could be compared to flavors of ice cream. There are many kinds of ice cream, but they are all ice cream. They aren't pie, or cake, or salad. In real life, people know when they are eating ice cream, and when they are eating something else.

Some Catholic apologists say that there are 30,000 different Protestant denominations. This is not true. Dr. Eric Svendsen has made an in-depth study of this claim. There is no valid foundation for it. His book "On This Slippery Rock" has a chapter about it, which you can read on-line. Dr. Svendsen also has an on-line article about diversity in Catholic beliefs. [Note 2 gives addresses.]… Let's compare this to something in everyday life. There is a huge difference between cats and dogs and horses. Now if you narrow it down to dogs, there are many different varieties. And within each variety, there are subgroups. For example, there are different kinds of collies and different kinds of poodles.

Catholic apologists act as if differences in Protestant churches are like the huge differences between cats and horses and birds and dogs. In reality, they are like the differences between different kinds of dogs (variations in the same kind of thing.) Often, they are like the differences between different kinds of poodles or different kinds of collies (small variations in things which are essentially the same)…” (From www.jesus-is-lord.com/spiritof.htm#ch11 “The Spirit of Roman Catholicism What Lies Behind the Modern Public Image?” by Mary Collins in 2002)

It’s time to further explain Dr. Svendsen’s “On This Slippery Rock” which refutes the 30,000 Protestant demoninations claim more elaborately. Svendsen’s work has found according to Barret’s research that there are 8,196 denominations of Protestants and 223 denominations of Catholics (which Barret broke down into 2,942 Catholic separate denominations in just 1970with 3,294 Protestant denominations in the same year). Barrett also unified many names of the same Protestant group into denominations even if there are no theological differences between them.

Not to mention that there are only about less than 2 dozen main Protestant groups not 30,000. Catholicism itself are in numerous divisions like Catholic feminists, (nuns, priests, and historians who openly defy the Pope, Liberation theology Catholics, Catholic Pentecostals, Christo-Pagans [Latin American Catholic influenced by folk Catholicism with Amerindian paganism], and Evangelical Catholics. I forgot about the Spiritist Cathlics, moderates, conservatives, traditionalists, Sedevacantists, and caretaria Catholics. No Catholic apologist mentions this at all. What is the reason why Catholicism isn’t Christian?

Basically, Roman Catholicsim acquires a false base of authority which are the Pope and its tradition. Also, it teaches the wrong way of salvation. It emphasis is misplaced in the 7 sacraments to be saved instead of Christ’s blood alone. Its acceptance of Christ’s divinity is accurate, but it believes that an object transforms into God plus Christ’s death wasn’t enough for atonement. It also gives unnecessary adulation to Mary plus adds false dogma as integral of its creed like: the infallibility of the Pope in 1870, Scapular in 1521, purgatory proclaimed as a tenet in 1439, etc. You can copy this expose to assit Catholics to leave that church and believe on real concepts.

Catholicism (like Masonry) is one of the easiest religions to refute, but its supporters are one of the thoughest to get through. I guess since they’ve been so conditioned (almost cultic) in following those systems. They are involved in the Inquistion, murder of Jews and real Christians, supporting the One World Religion, the international slave trade, pedophile preists, false doctrines, and even never excommunicated Adolf Hitler.

The Priesthood

*I have over 200 verses to refute Catholicism, but this is a simple summary to simply refuted their primary doctrines. Roman Catholicism institutes a select priesthood, but priests as clergy has no basis from scripture today. Only in the Old Law were priests instrumental in religious services as performing sacrifices, etc. Now in the New Testament, The Lord Jesus Christ is the only High Priest after the order of Melchizedek, his new title. Behold this 2 verses to prove that: “Whither the forerunner is for us entered, even Jesus, made an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.” (Hebrews 6:20) and:

“But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building.” (Hebrews 9:11). Christ Jesus is the only mediator between God the Father and man (1 Timothy 2:5), yet priests in Catholicism have a special status as a mediator to “forgive” sins. The priesthood today is extended unto all believers (1 Peter 2:5-9, Revelation 1:6). The Levitical priesthood had the old law of using the blood of animals, but now they can never atone sin, but through the precious blood of Christ alone. Catholic priests are celibate, but mandatory celibacy enforced by anyone is forbidden and a doctrine of devils. (1 Timothy 4:1-3). Elders, bishops, pastors are many titles of select clergy not priest plus even a bishop should have one wife in marriage. (1 Timothy 3:2-6).

The Papacy

The Papacy is a system whose head is the Pope and Catholics proclaim Peter as its first. According to Catholicism, Peter is the Rock, but throughout the OT and NT, Christ is the Rock and foundation not Peter: “And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ” (1 Cor. 10:4), “For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ” (1 Cor. 3:11), “As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumblingstone and rock of offence: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.” (Romans 9:33)

Mt. 16:16-20 is the prime verse apologists use to justify Peter’s Papacy, but that isn’t the case. The Lord Jesus Christ said “thou art Peter [in Greek that’s Petros or a masculine word for small rock] and upon this rock [Petra, or a feminine Greek word for a large rock], I will build my church.” The Rock is Christ or his and the confession that built his church. Even John 1:42 gives the name of Cephas as meaning a stone. Cephas is Petros in Greek not Petra. Mt. 18:18 has the keys of heavens, but in the sense of opening the door of salvation to Israel first then the Gentiles, so all men can have a chance to enter in the kingdom of God. That power is also given to Christ’s apostles and disciples (John 20:23).

Let’s remember that the foundation of the apostles is connected to Christ and Christ is the head of the Church (Eph. 2:20, Col. 2:19) The Pope is proclaimed as “Holy Father”, but Holy Father is a name utilized for God alone and it’s blasphemy to call a man by God’s name. (John 7:11, Rev. 15:4, 1 Samuel 2:2). Christ forbids to call a man father in part of a spiritual teacher like a rabbi (Mt. 23:7-9). God tells us to address him not as father. Father is used in the Bible for human offspring or lineage, but not spiritual religious titles for clergy (2 Cor. 6:18, 1 Tim. 5:1, John 8:38-39).

Peter was never a Pope for Peter was married (Mt. 8:14, 15) while popes aren’t, Peter would never let a man bow before him (Acts 10:25, 26), yet people bow before Karol, and Peter never exhitied supremacy over the Church. James’ advice on the Jerusalem Council was followed not Peter’s (Acts 15:13-19), Paul rebuked Peter, and Christ exhorted the greatest to be a servant for all (Mark 9:33-35) with no special papal leadership given unto Peter. The concept of a pope yet along the word Peope is no where in the Bible. Pope comes from Papa, a title for pagan Roman Emperors. Christ is the only foundation indeed. (1 Cor. 3:10).

Mary

Mary is a great, brave woman, but she isn’t the Mother of God for God pre-existed Mary. Isaiah 43:10 quotes God as saying “Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me.” God is from everlasting to everlasting and only Mary is the earthly mother of Jesus Christ not the mother of whole pre-existence. God has no mother. Mary does have sin for all humans including Mary are sinners, so it’s impossible for Mary to be without sin: “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;” (Romans 3:23) and “But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.

If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” (1 John 1:8). Romans 5:12 proves that more. Luke 1:28 is a verse Catholics use to justify her as sinless and superior to all women, but it only says that Mary is highly favored among women not above women or full of grace. Only God is full of Grace: “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.” (John 1:14). Other people are bestowed graced, blessed, and favored as well not just Mary (Mt. 25:34, Eph. 1:6, Romans 6:15).

The Mass

“The victim is one and the same: the same now offers through the ministry of priest, who then offered himself on the cross; only the manner of offering is different." In this divine sacrifice which is celebrated in the Mass, the same Christ who offered himself once in a bloody manner on the altar of the cross is contained and is offered in an unbloody manner." (#1367, p.381)

The tabernacle is to be situated "in church in a most worthy place with the greatest of honor. The dignity, placing, and security of the Eucharistic tabernacle should foster adoration before the Lord really present in the Blessed Sacrament of the altar." (#1183, p. 335).

This is transubstantiation or the belief that the bread and wine of the mass becomes the actual body and blood of Jesus Christ, but the appearance and texture of the bread and wine remain the same. That church gives their mass in an unbloodly manner, yet Christ had one bloodly sacrifice (Hebrew 9:22). In religious services, all believers are forbidden to eat blood, yet Romanism claims they have the same blood and body of Jesus Christ. (Acts 15:10, Acts 21:25) Eucharistic adoration violates the 2nd commandment since we are to never worship to bow religiously to anything, but only to God. The mass is just an object and isn’t God (Exodus 20:4-5) Communion is solely a remembrance and John 6 utilized metaphors to mention the method of salvation (Luke 22:19).

Throughout John 6, Christ present the belief that belief on him saved not eating his flesh. John 6:43-47, John 6:34-36, John 6:36-40 all show that eating physical bread will leave our body, but the internzlaing of him will lead to salvation. John 6:63 called the spirit of God which gives life not the flesh profiting nothing. The eating of Jesus’ flesh and drinking his blood literally aren’t mentioned in John 6 for that will be cannibalism which is forbidden in the Bible. Christ ony has 2 comigs in his total physical form not multiple masses (1 Thes. 4:16). Christ’s sacfrice on the cross was an one-time event with no repeats in the mass. Even Paul said that Christ’s presence physically in communion is non-existent (1 Cor. 5:16) Christ is not contained in an Eucharistic temple (Acts 7:48-49). The mass decays, but Christ’s blood and body can’t (Pslam 16:10).

Sola Scriptura

The Scriptures are superior to tradition and here’s logic reasons how and why. The Word of God is a compass to a person’s spiritual hearth and one of the breaths that gives life to Christians. All scriptures is inspired and God’s word is place above his name not tradition: “But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them; And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works” (2 Timothy 3:14-17)

and

“I will worship toward thy holy temple, and praise thy name for thy lovingkindness and for thy truth: for thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name” (Pslam 138:2). Sola Scriptura means simply that using the Scriptures alone is sufficient enough to derive the decrees of God. You can be reassured with the scriptures (Acts 17:1-5).

Tradition is never given as much praise and magnification as the Bible has. Here’s what is Truth: “Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth” (John 17:17). The Scripture cannot be broken (John 10:38). In comparision, no tradition have been propelled on such a level as the scriptures have, therefore the scriptures are superior to tradition.

Christ in Matthew 15:1-3 condemned the Pharisees’ tradition since it was contrary to the Word of God: “Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying, Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread. But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?” If the scriptures were equal to tradition, then no tradition would be condemned, but some verse have degatory comments about some traditions.

Christ never condemned the Word of God at all. Therefore, tradition isn’t equal to the word of God. It is the word of God alone that is living and active: “For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.” (Hebrews 4:12).

Baptism/Confession

"The Lord himself affirms that Baptism is necessary for salvation." (Pg. 352, #1257)

"The Church does not know of any other means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude..." (Pg. 352, #1257)

Actually, baptism is not necessary for salvation, but Jesus Christ is necessary for salvation. Baptismal regeneration not only originated from pagan religions, but has no basis in scripture for belief is required before baptism. (Acts 8:36-37) Salvation is done by confessing your sins to God and believe on Christ and his burial and resurrection. This is the prime verse for believers’ baptism. Only unbelief condemns you to hell (Mark 16:16). The blood of Christ cleanses all sins not baptismal water (Mt. 26:28, James 3:25). Paul didn’t even come to baptize, but to save souls without it (1 Cor. 1:14-17, Acts 8:34).

Christ didn’t baptize a soul except his disciples and he saved people (John 4:2). Baptism comes from the Greek word “baptize” meaning immersion not sprinkle. Peter gives the perfect definition of baptism as a good answer of good conscience toward God as a figure. (1 Peter 3:21) As for confession only God can forgive sins. (Mark 2:7, Acts 8: 22, Hebrews 4:16) not priests. James only mention to confess your faults one to each other never to confess your sins to a man and expect a man to forgive all of your sins. (James 5:16) The apostles solely had the power to allow the Holy Spirit to proclaim the forgiveness of sins (John 20:22-23). Even the thief on the cross died without baptism to be in heaven (Luke 23:43). Throughout the NT, the son of man (Christ) had the power to forgive sins. John 3:16 eloquently issues the real way to be saves. So, baptism is after salvation for Paul only baptized souls after they believed (Acts 8:36-37, Acts 10:30, 31, 33, Acts 18:8, Acts 2:4, Acts 8:12, Acts 8:13).

By TruthSeeker24 (Timothy)
March 22, 2005
12:26 pm. EST

SOLA SCRIPTURA
SOLA FIDE
SOLA GLORIA DEO
SOLA CHRISTO
SOLA GRATIA

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
SEMPER LIBER

RESURRECTION

7 CITIES
NORFOLK
PORTSMOUTH
HAMPTON
SUFFOLK
NEWPORT NEWS
CHESAPEAKE
VIRGINIA BEACH


OTHERS:
POQUOSON
SMITHFIELD
SOUTHHAMPTON COUNTY
JAMESTOWN
YORKTOWN
SUSSEX
NORTHHAMTPON COUNTY
ISLE OF WRIGHT
WILLIAMSBURG
EASTERN SHORE
ALL OF NORTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA
LANCASTER

___________________


Papacy/Peter:

1). Acts 11:26/Acts 26:28, 1 Peter 4:16 Followers of Christ are called Christians not Catholics. The word “catholic” are not mentioned historically until the 100 Ad quote of Ignatius and Justin. They meant “catholic” as all believers universal not a subjected church to one city (Rome). There was no Pope or Papacy concept whatsoever in the early church. The first to use the word “pontifex” was Bishop Hygnius of Rome in 149 AD. And he didn’t recognize himself as Pope. Later Pope Leo I and Pope Damascus would make claims of universal primacy of Rome, but even in the 300’s and 400’s, many people dissented with that idea. The Papacy is therefore by gradual development and isn’t biblical whatsoever. In fact, there is no historical evidence whatsoever to prove Peter is the first bishop of Rome. Polycarp, Clement of Rome, Irenaeus, etc mentioned not one line of him being bishop of Rome. Only by Jerome’s literature do we see signs of people believing in the 25-year episcopate reign of Peter in Rome. Historically, Linus is the first bishop of Rome not Peter. Hippolytus and even Eusbeius mentioned Peter as dying in Rome, but Linus as the first bishop of Rome.
2). 1 John 2:26-27 You don’t need a church or men to interpret scripture for you.
3). Philippians 1:1 Throughout the NT, the early church composed of the offices of bishop (overseers), elders, and presbyter (terms used interchangeably to show the same office), deacons, and other stations without a Pope or Papacy.
4). Eph. 1:22-23 Christ is the head of all the church not Karol.
5). 1 Thes. 5:21 Individuals who are believers have a right to test the teachings of any church. God wants his people to check things out for themselves using Scripture as a yardstick. It keeps us mature, as Christians not swayed by false doctrine. The Papacy rarely has its believers to question their so-called “infallible” beliefs, decrees, bulls, etc.
6). 1 Cor. 10:4 The Rock was Christ (not Peter). Also see Ps. 94:22.
7). 1 Cor. 3:11 No other foundation exists but Christ. The Greek word for foundation in that verse is Themelios meaning of institution or system of truth or the foundation. Christ is the pure system and all order of the church originates from Jesus Christ not from the magisterium or any false Church. The foundation isn’t Peter or the church but God alone.
8). John 14:26, John 16:13, 1 Cor. 2:13 the Holy Spirit, not the magisterium of the Catholic Church will interpret scripture for God’s children and help them understand all things.
9). Romans 9:33 Christ is the foundation again. See also 2 Timothy 2:19 mentioning the foundation of God.
10). Matthew 18:18 The keys Christ gives to the disciples and apostles not Peter solely. The keys are used as a steward though.
11). Acts 8:14 Peter was sent by the other apostles along with John. If Peter were a Pope, wouldn’t he do the sending or travel without a proclamation from other Christians to adamantly do so.
12).Acts 13:9 Saul had a name change to Paul; just like Peter presenting even more equality between the 2.
13).Eph. 2:20 Christ is shown as the chief cornerstone. Also all the apostles are foundation stones of the church showing more equality. There are many instances of Rome being reminded that it wasn’t possessing full jurisdiction throughout the church. Here are a couple of examples of this:

A). In the 100’s Polycrates, bishop of Ephesus, rebuked Victor, bishop of Rome over the Easter issue. He said that “We ought to obey God rather than man” to bishop Victor. Also Polycarp, disciple of John couldn’t agree with Anicetus, bishop of Rome on the issue of Easter as well.
B). Cyprian rebukes Stephen, bishop of Rome in his Council of Carthage decree saying, “No man sits himself up as bishop of bishops (or Pope)”
C). Polycarp and Ignatius used the words Bishop or elder interchangeably and even used mentioned multiple bishops existing in one city and that in no way denote a Papacy.
D). Pope Damascus and Pope Leo I makes claims of being the only successor of Peter deriving solely from Rome, yet even in the 300’s and 400’s, many people denied that claim and even in the Council of Chalcedon in 451 recognized the equal standing between Rome and Constantinople. I’m not even mentioning the immoral conduct of many Popes during the Dark Ages.
E). Many early popes denied many Catholic doctrines like Gelasius denying the Assumption of Mary, etc. The consensus for a Papacy existing in 33 AD. or 100 AD. is a myth.
F). Many early Popes even denied papal infallibility. Popes Vigilinus, Innocent III, Clement Iv, Gregory IV, Adrian VI, and Paul IV all disclaimed the attribute of infallibility.
G). Hippolytus disagreed with Bishop Callistus I of Rome’s dealing with Modalist heretics of Sabellius. As a result, Hippolytus rebuked Callistus and Callistus ended ties with Hippolytus. Catholic apologists say he had a re-uniting period before Hippolytus’ death, but even with that there’s still one bishop of Rome disagreeing with one of the greatest early church leaders, which was Hippolytus, in that span of time. Some historians even call Hippolytus an anti-pope (popes didn’t exist in Hippolytus’ age.)
H). In 664 AD. at the Synod of Whitby, the Celtic Church and the Roman Catholic also couldn’t agree on the Easter issue and Papal supremacy. The Celtic Church with Columba, Patrick, Colman, Aidan, Columbanus, and other people existed before Roman Catholicism yet again. As centuries past, the Celtic Church was forced to Scotland, while the Catholics forcibly merged their religion on the people left behind.
I). The Catholic Church also didn’t have full jurisdiction on the Church of the East. The apostles Thomas, Jude, and Bartholomew founded the Church of the East. Later as centuries past, the Church of the East and the Nestorians creates an automous structure showing God’s word to the Eastern world. Jesuits by 1599 subjugated the whole Syrian, Eastern Church. The good news is that even today, there are independent bodies of the Eastern Church that aren’t under Catholic jurisdiction that exist even today.
J). By the 14th century the papacy had become a pawn of political power. The French forced the popes to move from Rome to Avignon in what has been called the Babylonian Captivity of the papacy from 1309 to 1377. Following this episode was the Great Western Schism (1378-1418), during which opposing popes tried to rule. This ended with the Council of Constance, which deposed the popes and named Martin V (reigned 1417-31) as pope. In that time span of the early 1400’s, 3 popes were trying to reign at the same time. This and other evidences give the Roman Catholic church in an inconsistent light.

14). 1 Peter 2:68 Jesus is the head of the corner, cornerstone, rock of offense (not Peter).
15).Acts 9:10-16 Jesus said he called Paul, not Peter to go before the Gentiles and preach the gospel also to the children of Israel. Peter preached to the Gentiles and Romans, but Paul was specifically called to preach to do this command.
16). 1 Timothy 4:1-4 Mandatory celibacy for the Pope is forbidden and is a doctrine of demons.
17). Isaiah 44:8 God is the only Rock, and there is no other. See also Isa. 8:14 saying God is a rock of offense.
18). Deut. 32:31 Rock is shown as describing God alone also mentioned in Pslam 18:2.
19). Mat. 21:42 The cornerstone is Christ and Also Acts 5:29 says, “We ought to obey God rather than man.” (Magisterium, councils, decrees, Popes, etc.)
20). 2 Cor. 2:11 Paul isn’t inferior to the other apostles, but equal. Equality of the apostles is definitely conceived. See also Gal. 1:12, 2:2-8.
21).Eph. 4:5 Christ is the one Lord to be acknowledged and also see Mt. 26:72-74 showing Peter denying the Lord. (Peter is just a normal sinner in need of salvation just like all people need salvation and equal to any other human being.) The Papal denotation of Peter is therefore unnecessary.
21). 1 Peter 5:1-4 I, your fellow presbyter (not being lords over God’s heritage). Papal subjection is void as a result. See also Isaiah 22:25. That verse mentioning the kings who had those keys was fallible and broke and fell. They temporary utilized the keys, but Christ eternally possesses the keys of David forever. See also Rev. 2:7, Rev. 1:8.
22). Heb. 13:20 Jesus is the great Shepherd of the sheep not the Pope.
23). Mt. 23:13, Luke 11:52, Rev. 9:1-2, Rev. 20:1-2 Other beings had keys to be used not Peter alone.
24). 1 Cor. 12:12-27 The members of the church are expressed by body parts, but Christ is its total, heavenly, and earthly head not Karol.
25).Mt. 16:23 Peter is called Satan by Christ showing his frailty and sinfulness devoid of Papal power. Popes are rarely rebuked in the Roman Catholic Church. In a manner of calling a Pope Satan by Catholic flock, Catholic believers can have a risk of being excommunicated, condemned as heretics, etc. by the intensity of it.
26). John 18:36 Christ’s kingdom isn’t of this world, yet the Pope claims to be a temporal monarch of Vatican City. (It’s in heaven not in the Vatican). See also Luke 17:20 proving that the kingdom of God is in heaven being spiritual. There is no earthly headquarters of the church ruled by a human vicar. Also see Exodus 17:6 calling God the Rock.
27). John 17:11 Holy Father is used for God the Father. It’s blasphemy to call a man by God’s name. See also Rev. 15:4 and 1 Sam. 2:2.
28). Acts 10:25-26 Peter refused Cornelius to bow to him, yet many popes are benefluented or bowed to by clergy and other people within the Roman Catholic Church. One example of this is new bishops in an ordination ceremony bowing before the Pope in St. Peter’s Basilica.
29). Heb. 7:26, Heb. 7:1-2, Rev. 1:5-6 Christ is the only King and High Priest. Christ paid taxes, yet the Pope is exempt from taxes. Christ is given a crown of thorns, but the Popes wear a triple crown (tiara). The contrasting actions of both individuals make the Papacy dissimilar to Christianity. In John 1:44, Gal. 2:9, 1 Cor. 9:5 Peter was not always mentioned first in the NT. In John he was named after Andrew, in Galatians, James is shown first, and in 1 Cor. He is named after the apostles, etc.
30). Rev. 3:7 The keys of David belong to Christ alone not Popes acting as supposed “successors”. See also 1 Peter 3:22 saying that Christ has full 100% authority over his church without Papal influence. In Matt. 23:10, Christ is the only Master with no Popes as masters.
31). 1 John 3:2 The Holy Spirit is our guide to bear witness to the Word of God not a pope, false church, church, or any anointed man. The Holy Spirit is enough for every single believer in Christ.
32). Mt. 20:25-26, Mark 10:42-43, and Luke 22:25-26 Servant hood is a Christian character and Popes are more in tuned with subjection plus a leadership, control-orientated influence exhibited to the followers of Romanism than servant hood.
33). Acts 15:1-22 The First Council of Jerusalem was presided over by James not Peter. In fact, Paul writes more NT books than Peter and explains the gospel more than Peter. Is Paul a Pope? No, just like Peter isn’t by tons of evidence. Also see Isaiah 42:8 that makes it’s clear that all glory is not to be given to any Pope, but God alone.
34). Mt. 28:18-20 All authority is given unto Christ and not given to Popes. In fact Catholicism had many schisms or divisions like a). Donatist (311 AD.), b). Orthodox (1054 AD.), Reformation (1517 AD.), Sedecavantists (1870 and 1965 AD.), etc
35). Galatians 2:11-14 Paul rebuked Peter for his actions (Popes are rarely rebuked today especially in the past (i.e. Bulls presented by Popes are almost impossible to rebuke. Also in history, cardinals, archbishops, or any other clergy rarely rebukes popes in Catholicism.)
36). Mt. 8:20 Christ has no place to rest his head in his first coming, yet Karol (the pope) lives in a place surrounded by wealth and pomp. Even Mt. 21:42 say that Jesus is the only Rock (stone, cornerstone).
37). Rev. 2:6-15 God dislikes the Nicolaitine spirit of extreme controlling hierarchal systems with that kind of clergy and laity similar to Romanism.
38). Acts 8:18-21 Peter would not take money, for not God would give freely. (It’s the opposite of Ropes giving and receiving tons of money by indulgences, etc) There is nothing wrong with being rich, but can the Vatican sacrifice pompous palaces in exchange to create some reasonable actions like reforming and revising their religion.
39). Acts 1:15-26 A group decision decided who were to be an apostle not Peter solely. (That isn’t Papal in most instances except in papal religious decrees or re-election of clergy).
40). 2 Samuel 22:32, Psalm 94:22, Psalm 18:31 God is the Rock not Peter.
41). Mt. 8:14, Luke 4:38, Mark 1:30, 1 Cor. 9:10 Peter has a wife (modern Popes don’t). Also see Galatians 2:1-9 saying that the apostles are called pillars recognizing their equality to each other.
42). Rev. 2:12-17 Christ condemned the Pergamos church era by adding pagan rituals of Balaam similar to the Papacy adding pagan rituals over the centuries. (i.e. Rosary, Eucharist, Confirmation, image veneration, etc.)
43). 1 Peter 5:1-2 Peter calls himself and elder (not head apostle or Pope) and also John is called “the elder” in 2 John 1.
44). 1 Peter 5:4 Christ is the Chief Shepherd only. See also Rev. 21:14making mention of the foundations of New Jerusalem being 12 named after the 12 apostles making more references of equality to all of the apostles. Also Acts 1:21-22 says that the apostles had no successors, for to succeed them, one had to be a witness to Christ’s resurrection.
45). Luke 22:24-26, Matthew 18:1 An argument occurs with the apostles about who was the greatest. (Peter didn’t expressively admit his supremacy to end the feud with the others, but Christ later called for servant-like statue among all apostles displaying even more equality.
46). John 10:11, 14-16 Jesus is the only good Shepherd. See also 2 Thes. 2:3-4. That verse says that one man like the Pope with so much exalting classifications even trying to call himself Vicar (substitute, or replacement of in Greek and Latin) Christ, which is supremely blasphemous, is like the Antichrist. Antichrist is divided into 1 prefix and 1 suffix, which are anti-, and -Christ making up just a word. Anti in Greek is Ante meaning substitute or in the place of. Add it together and Antichrist in Greek means someone who “tries” to substitute or take the place of Christ. Who is that individual? The Pope is an antichrist in that manner since he claims to be the representative of Christ and tries to takes Christ’s place (i.e. Pope Leo XIII in the l800’s said “We hold upon this earth the place of God Almighty.” How obvious is that, but the Po pe is not the Antichrist of Revelation but like an antichrist who has blasphemous titles, false beliefs, etc. That real Antichrist according to the Bible and church leaders like Tertullian Justin Marytr, Hippolytus, etc believes it’s a man who will reign for 3 ½ yrs, etc.) Many of the Reformers called the Pope “The Antichrist” because of the great immorality and degenerate religion of Catholicism. The Pope isn’t the Antichrist because he is so blatant and the Bible says he will come as one man not many men. The Pope is most probably the False Prophet in the One World Religion system.
47). Acts 20:28 To feed the sheep is exhorted to all of the church not just Peter. See also Numbers 23:19 displaying that God alone is infallible in all judgments, decisions, etc. A Pope’s decrees are always subjected to God’s word. Many of the Papal decrees have error in it. (i.e. Bull Unum Sanctum of the 1302 by Pope Boniface VIII says every people must be subject to the Pope for salvation or the Syllabus of Errors in the 1800’s condemning Bible societies, religious freedom, and even democracy.)
48). Acts 6:1-4 The leadership of the church is automous (self-governing) under no denominational hierarchy. Also see 1 Peter 1:1 classifying himself as only an apostle (no bishop, Pope, or the head apostle).
49). John 1:42 Cephas means stone not Rock by Christ’s own words. See also Titus 1:5-9 showing that the human leader of any church is a Pastor or Bishop with deacons, etc not popes.
50). Timothy 3:15 The church is the pillar and ground of truth not the truth or the foundation. See also 1 Peter 2:4-8 presenting Jesus as the rock upon which the church is founded. Nowhere in the Bible would you find the Church called the Rock or the foundation but the pillar and ground of truth. God alone is the Rock and the unbreakable foundation.
51). Eph. 1:22-23/ Col. 1:18 The Papacy is forbidden and Christ receives all preeminence not Karol. Also see Romans 11:18-22 which Paul warned the church to be in faith or cut off being fallible, but Christ’s church will never let the gates of hell prevail over it.
52). Acts 14:27, 1 Cor. 16:9, 2 Cor 2:12 Doors are being opened by God using keys. (Not solely Peter can use keys as a steward.)
53). Mt. 23:9 Call no clergy Father in the spiritual term of the word for high religious significance within the church clergy. Therefore, it is forbidden to call a priest by that title as well. Father in the NT is only called for human offspring, lineage, or an important figure in the past at the OT. Certainly no clergy such as priests were called father in the NT.
54). Eph. 5:23-26 Christ is Head over a Pope being all-powerful and having full authority on heaven and on earth.
55). 3 John 9-11 Believers are subjected church-wise to church leaders as long as they’re in submission to God. Any contradicting church leader like a Pope is rejected. The church is therefore democratic and executive only in executing the word of God not legislative adding traditions that are contrary to God’s word. The church is special and important, but no church is above God’s word and any church that tries to contradict God’s word should be rejected and rebuked until the church changes, etc.
56). Mat. 10:16, Luke 10:3, Ezekiel 34:6, 1 Peter 2:25 Sheep are mentioned showing the faithful not necessarily showing clergy or pastors. (It includes all believers).
57). John 16:7-14, Mt. 16:18, Mt. 18:18, John 20:22,23, Matt. 28:18-20, Acts 1:8, 2:1-4 When reading those verses you can find that all apostles received the Holy Spirit, had the same authority, and all received the same commission. If all apostles had the same duties, that represents equality for all apostles. Nowhere in the Bible would you find Peter being called “Pontifex Maximus”, “Holy Father”, “Chief Apostle”, “Vicar of Christ”, “Pope”, etc. You can never deduce that from God’s word or in the early church, but you can find that in Catholicism as a product of gradual development and additions of tons of tradition. Roman Catholicism is an addition tradition submission religion. It’s nothing more or less.
58). Acts 11:1-30 The Church was situated in the early era of Christianity at Jerusalem and Antioch as it main headquarters not Rome. Even those 2 cities didn’t recognized themselves as being superior in religious jurisdiction to all other cities or areas at that time. Roman Catholicism believes that Rome was superior early on in papal primacy, but that isn’t the case. That’s because there was no Pope, papal primacy, cardinal, archbishops, etc even existed in Christianity in its early existence anyway.
59). Psalm 118:8 It is better to trust the Lord than to put confidence in man. (Catholic trusts the Pope to be infallible in faith and morals of his ex-cathedra declarations, etc.)

The Southern Baptist Church and Billy Graham

Southern Baptist Church

Fatuity flusters in the Southern Baptists, the largest Protestant denomination in America. I used to have great admiration for them until I figured their grave treasonous concessions they’ve done for years. The Southern Baptist Church has extra-church institutions and denominational structures yoking congregations today. The biblical church actually had totally autonomous congregations in no complexities. Denominational structures are just man-made with no biblical authority on anyone.

Their church is also ecumenical. It was only until 2004 when the SBC (Southern Baptist Church) ended ties with the World Baptist Alliance (almost as extreme as the NCC and the WCC). The SBC does align with the China Church Council. Council K. H. Ting (“Honorable” President) is a member and he believes in denying the infallibility of the Bible, denied the judgment of sinful people, loves liberation theology, and believes that the truth is found in all religions. What a lie since Christ perfectly said out of his mouth that I am the way, truth, and the life and no man comes to the Father, but by me.

The SBC has dialogue with the Roman Catholic Church and Catholic priests have spoken in SBC pulpits. Even the occult Promise Keepers are supported by the SBC with David Cloud recording proof of it. The Southern Baptist Church refuses to help Billy Graham repent of his blatant apostasy.

They allow deacons to have pastor powers which aren’t mentioned in the scriptures at all. They allow women to acquire leadership roles like Anne Graham Lotz [Billy Graham’s daughter] preaching at a Evangelism Conference in 1996. According to the Ohio Baptist Messenger at July 2003, Lotz preached in a Sunday morning worship service at June 15, 2003 sponsored by the Conference of Southern Baptist Evangelists. This is forbidden in 1 Timothy 2:12.

They embrace the charismatic movement. The Southern Baptist Church is even yoked with the Satanic Masonic Lodge and the Eastern Star. Sorry, I will have told God’s truth that Freemasonry is anti-biblical and wrong. In June 1992, a Southern Baptist annual conference was unsuccessful to root out Freemasonry out of the Convention. One of its chairmen, Ron Philips, lied and said that Masonry was compatible with Christianity. Constantly for years, me and scholars like Jack Harris displayed God’s truth of Freemasonry being evil.

Freemasonry is Satanic and wrong for its enforcing unbiblical oath, pagan symbolism, and evil philosophy making Freemasonry as not of God. The “Sovereign Grand Commander” Freemason said that “Southern Baptists have become the 1st Christian denomination that essentially blesses the Masonic Lodge.” (Christian News, November 20, 1993). My educated guess is that 40% of the church is infiltrated by the Freemasons.

They are nothing more than neo-evangelicals and won’t use biblical separation against apostate churches, the Masons, and the Catholics. David Cloud wrote about Dr. Godsey, from Southern Baptist University, attack on the Bible in 1996. As for me, I’m an independent fundamental Baptist in my religious beliefs, but if you follow the Word; it doesn’t matter what title you claim. A title is never more important than a relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ. www.overcomerministry.org/ Materials/books.html is a site showing the truth.

 

 

Billy Graham

Hoaxing injustice extends even unto Billy Graham. Billy Graham is not only an apostate, but a strong deception to lull unsuspecting Christians to the sleep of ecumenicalism and the One World Religion. Graham even said that Jesus Christ lied. Rather, Billy Graham lied not Jesus Christ. Ed Parker, who created the End times Deception site and a real fighter against the N.W.O., written extensively on Billy Graham with so much evidence that BGEA (Billy Graham Evangelistic Corporation) refused to sue him for defamation since he has the truth. Parker recorded Graham telling a Parade Magazine that:

“I fully adhere to the fundamental tenets of the Christian faith for myself and my ministry, but as an American, I respect other faiths to God.”

This is bunk since God said this “I am the way, the truth and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6).

Christ said blatantly that he’s the only path to God the Father. Graham is just wrong here and a liar. Graham’s own dogma is contrary to the Holy Scriptures. Graham isn’t sure of a literal Hell by his own words in the Time Magazine at the November 15, 1993 issue. He accepts infant baptism, he called homosexuality a sin, but claimed that people are born that way [proven by Dr. Cathy Burns’ book], and support abortion in cases of rape, incest, etc. Graham even actively agreed with the government policy of fighting in the Vietnam War. Graham praised the Catholic Church (like in their worship of Mary) for decades and won’t convert them to real Christianity.

There is no doubt that Billy Graham is a 33rd Degree Freemason. Jim Shaw, an ex-33rd Degree Freemason who turned into a believer in God, with Tom McKenney’s book The Deadly Deception rightfully exposed Freemasonry. In the book, Jim Shaw mentions his 33rd Degree initiation ceremony where Billy Graham was present. Graham could only been a Freemason since he witnessed Shaw’s initiation inside of a Temple. Even Dr. Robert Morey wrote a book on Freemasonry that he had the membership of Graham’s 33rd Freemasonry status in the membership file at the library of the House of the Temple (the headquarters of the Supreme Council of the 33rd Degree).

Now, Morey backtracked and said that librarians told him that the file existed without him examining it. Gram endorsed the Masonic DeMolay group for boys. Many people on his Billy Graham Evangelistic Association staff are Freemasons like William A. Watson (a member of the development of mind control participating in Masonic-run Baylor University), David M. McConnel, Arthur Lee Malory, etc. According to Ed Parker, BGEA said that they feel that Freemasonry is incompatible with Christianity, but BGEA allowed Graham to help his Brother 33rd Degree Freemasons Robert Schuller, Norman Vincent Peale, and Oral Roberts (all Illuminatus) to develop their “ministries.”

Ed Parker sums up his research proving that Graham is a Freemason as well:

“The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association has done it again! Billy has had his name removed from a Famous Freemason list done by a Masonic lodge once again. The good news is that Balaams Ass website copied a mirror of the Masonic site because Steve anticipated this move by the BGEA. The Louisiana Masonic Webpage has moved and is now located at www.la-mason.com/ This Masonic web page has gone through a major change and the front page no longer resembles the mirror copy that is posted at Balaams Ass Web Site…Compare their new EDITED Famous Freemason list located at www.la-mason.com/famous.htm With the Mirror copy located at www.balaams-ass.com/journ...aham23.htm He should be listed under 'Other Famous Masons' I also request you to go to Composite Lodge #595 Webpage and see Billy Graham listed as a Famous Freemason before this list gets changed….Famous Mason list at members.aol.com/composite5/famous.htm
Homepage at members.aol.com/composite5/lodge.htm
Witnesses please EMAIL me…” (From www.geocities.com/endtime...n/list.htm “Billy Graham on Famous Freemason List” by Ed Parker)

Only Masonic Shriner clowns performed at his 1993 Portland Crusade, so Graham loves Freemasonry. It’s a known fact that Illuminatus William Randolph Hearst propped up Billy Graham into prominence. Hearst was no only part of the Knights of Malta, but a member of the Bohemian Grove who said to puff Graham up in 1946. Hearst was an adulterer and promoted Satanic plus New Age book. He was never a Christian, but a pagan:

“…David Hill went on to try to expose the New World Order and lost (was murdered) his life just as he finished a manuscript exposing it. Even a well-informed Christian like David Hill, who tried to warn Billy Graham about the NWO, was unaware of the extent of the deception of the Illuminati’s mind control. David didn’t know about programmed multiples. David Hill, who was a high ranking Scottish Rite Freemason and an important Mafia figure before he came to Christ, had even been the go between for Billy Graham and Joe Banana, a Mafia kingpin. It was David Hill, who innocently believing in Billy Graham, arranged the meeting for the two men. David Hill knew that William Randolph Hearst was part of the Illuminati; He was part of the branch Illuminati -- at what could be termed the 6th degree. William Randolph Hearst was totally into paganism. That is very obvious by a tour of his mansion in California which has been turned into a museum. It was William Randolph Hearst who financed the first three years of Billy Graham’s Crusades…” (From www.geocities.com/lord_vi...graham.htm “The Deception of Billy Graham, a Mind Control Front by Fritz Springmeier and others)

Henry Luce co-founded Time Magazine and helped fund one of Graham’s first crusades in NYC. Luce promoted Graham in his Time Magazine as well. Luce was a friend of the infamous anti-Semitic bootlegger Joe Kennedy. Luce was a member of the Skulls and Bones, part of the CFR, and decorated by the House of Orange with the Orange-Nassau. Luce’s hence is an Illuminist.
PhD. Carol George’s “God’s Salesman”, Oxford Press, in 1992 recorded that in August 19, 1960, Graham a top secret meeting. It was with 25 chosen guests in Mintreaux, Switzerland and they talked about how to block the election of JFK.

Norman Vincent Peale was the most prominent guest and the men were embarrassed when they were exposed. This is strange isn’t it since John F. Kennedy was never a Freemason and the Freemasons would kill in him in the “Killing of the King” ritual and other occult symbolism.

Also, Graham has a tendency to praise so many apostates, elitists, heretics, false criminals, and false Christians, that it’s crazy. He called Paul Tillich a great theologian, yet Tillich denied the virgin birth and resurrection of Christ’s flesh. Graham claimed that Dag Hammarskjod acquires Christian principles, but he’s the 2nd Secretary General of the U.N., New Ager, socialist, and was key to building the mediation room where one world religion is advanced. Graham considered Bill Clinton a true Christian for more than 10 years.

Clinton is pro-abortion, pro-Playboy [in a 2000 issue of Playboy, he’s pictured with Hugh Hefner] Hefner is a cousin of Bush and Kerry. Clinton is pro-homosexual, liar under oath, and member of a number of Secret Societies with no repentance of that. Ruth Carter Stapleton (a New Ager), Senator Mark Hatfield (a 33rd Degree and promoter of the Declaration of Interdependence calling for one world government, wanted a nuclear freeze, pro-abortion, and in favor of using taxpayer money to fund the pornographic NEA), John Rockefeller, Senator Robert Byrd (33rd Degree Freemason and involved in Tavistock’s MK-Ultra Project Monarch), Jeanne Dixon, etc. are Billy Graham’s allies.

In 1992, Billy Graham said in his “Embrace America 2000” radio program that the U.S. must embrace the New World Order. According to the BGEA webpage, Billy Graham received the Torch of Liberty plague by the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith in 1969. The B’nai B’rith is a Masonic group that accepts Jewish people and it was invented in 1843 by German Jews headed by Henry Jones according to Edith Starr-Miller’s 1933 Occult Theocracy (she died for us to show us this information).

 

The torch of liberty is an occult system related to Lucifer and the occult sciences admitted by Dr. Cathy Burns, the occultist Schure, and even 33rd Degree Freemason and Satanist Manly Palmer Hall. Dr. Cathy Burns’ “Billy Graham and His Friends” is an excellent book focusing on Graham’s apostasy. Hundreds of endnotes and a detailed biography make the case for his heresies. In this era of wolves in sheep clothing, Christians’ antennae ought to be activated more than ever to save souls and warn God’s sheep.

By TruthSeeker24 (Timothy)
March 22, 2005
12:26 pm. EST

SOLA SCRIPTURA
SOLA FIDE
SOLA GLORIA DEO
SOLA CHRISTO
SOLA GRATIA

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
SEMPER LIBER

RESURRECTION

7 CITIES
NORFOLK
PORTSMOUTH
HAMPTON
SUFFOLK
NEWPORT NEWS
CHESAPEAKE
VIRGINIA BEACH


OTHERS:
POQUOSON
SMITHFIELD
SOUTHHAMPTON COUNTY
JAMESTOWN
YORKTOWN
SUSSEX
NORTHHAMTPON COUNTY
ISLE OF WRIGHT
WILLIAMSBURG
EASTERN SHORE
ALL OF NORTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA
LANCASTER